Tools & Wizards About Us
sciencereviews2000.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

sciencereviews2000.co.uk

Science Reviews 2000 portfolio acquired by SAGE Publishing | SAGE Publications Ltd

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

278 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

120 ms

sciencereviews2000.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to sciencereviews2000.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Science Reviews 2000 best content for Iran right away, or after learning these important things about sciencereviews2000.co.uk

Effective 7th December 2018, SAGE has acquired four titles previously published by Science Reviews 2000. The acquisition results in the transfer of the following to SAGE: Avian Biology Research (ABR) ...

Visit sciencereviews2000.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Sciencereviews2000.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 278 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sciencereviews2000.co.uk performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

60/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

23/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

83/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value480 ms

59/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.067

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.5 s

59/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sciencereviews2000.co.uk

278 ms

jquery-lib.js

370 ms

Api.scilet.js

174 ms

main.css

254 ms

jquery-latest.min.js

26 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Sciencereviews2000.co.uk, 17% (9 requests) were made to Pbs.twimg.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (686 ms) belongs to the original domain Sciencereviews2000.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 260.8 kB (21%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

964.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sciencereviews2000.co.uk main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 950.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 20.9 kB

  • Original 29.4 kB
  • After minification 24.6 kB
  • After compression 8.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.8 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.9 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 80.3 kB

  • Original 950.0 kB
  • After minification 869.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Science Reviews 2000 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 135.3 kB

  • Original 216.5 kB
  • After minification 201.8 kB
  • After compression 81.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 135.3 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 24.3 kB

  • Original 29.6 kB
  • After minification 23.6 kB
  • After compression 5.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sciencereviews2000.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (35%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

33

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Science Reviews 2000. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sciencereviews2000.co.uk

sciencereviews2000.co.uk

278 ms

jquery-lib.js

jquery-lib.js

370 ms

Api.scilet.js

Api.scilet.js

174 ms

main.css

main.css

254 ms

jquery-latest.min.js

jquery-latest.min.js

26 ms

javascript.gp

javascript.gp

190 ms

cookieControl-4.1.min.js

cookieControl-4.1.min.js

253 ms

cookieControl-5.1.min.js

cookieControl-5.1.min.js

257 ms

imageflow.css

imageflow.css

177 ms

imageflow.js

imageflow.js

420 ms

unslider.min.js

unslider.min.js

337 ms

DOM.js

DOM.js

419 ms

jquery-extend.css

jquery-extend.css

81 ms

website-menu.css

website-menu.css

164 ms

avian-biology-research-front.jpg

avian-biology-research-front.jpg

237 ms

journal-of-chemical-research-frontv2.jpg

journal-of-chemical-research-frontv2.jpg

241 ms

progress-in-reaction-kinetics-and-mechanism-front.jpg

progress-in-reaction-kinetics-and-mechanism-front.jpg

240 ms

science-progress-front.jpg

science-progress-front.jpg

243 ms

journal-of-chemical-research-right.png

journal-of-chemical-research-right.png

326 ms

avian-biology-research-right.png

avian-biology-research-right.png

514 ms

progress-in-reaction-kinetics-and-mechanism-right.png

progress-in-reaction-kinetics-and-mechanism-right.png

556 ms

science-progress-right.png

science-progress-right.png

558 ms

light-burst.jpg

light-burst.jpg

265 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

177 ms

fac.png

fac.png

346 ms

in.png

in.png

337 ms

tw.png

tw.png

338 ms

JCR_vol_40_issue_2.png

JCR_vol_40_issue_2.png

455 ms

shopingbag1.png

shopingbag1.png

446 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

33 ms

ga.js

ga.js

17 ms

reflect2.php

reflect2.php

446 ms

reflect2.php

reflect2.php

446 ms

reflect2.php

reflect2.php

512 ms

reflect2.php

reflect2.php

686 ms

timeline.5d8406ab2e764a871ed41bd9aa0b693f.js

timeline.5d8406ab2e764a871ed41bd9aa0b693f.js

42 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

17 ms

syndication

syndication

106 ms

351987199614525440

351987199614525440

215 ms

timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css

timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css

4 ms

timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css

timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css

12 ms

SR2_logo_normal.jpg

SR2_logo_normal.jpg

136 ms

CejB2KxWsAAmJkr.jpg:small

CejB2KxWsAAmJkr.jpg:small

321 ms

CeilkL1WwAEozmj.jpg:small

CeilkL1WwAEozmj.jpg:small

294 ms

Cei9yeUWAAAI7sI.jpg:small

Cei9yeUWAAAI7sI.jpg:small

276 ms

Cei_ZSBW4AA6Jt5.jpg:small

Cei_ZSBW4AA6Jt5.jpg:small

290 ms

Cei868BW8AACLf0.jpg:small

Cei868BW8AACLf0.jpg:small

292 ms

CejCFg9WIAAsY8b.jpg:small

CejCFg9WIAAsY8b.jpg:small

300 ms

Ceik6w0WAAAxrxC.jpg:small

Ceik6w0WAAAxrxC.jpg:small

365 ms

CeikVvnW4AERG8V.jpg:small

CeikVvnW4AERG8V.jpg:small

385 ms

jot

jot

27 ms

nr-892.min.js

nr-892.min.js

48 ms

Accessibility Review

sciencereviews2000.co.uk accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

sciencereviews2000.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

sciencereviews2000.co.uk SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sciencereviews2000.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sciencereviews2000.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sciencereviews2000.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Science Reviews 2000. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: