Tools & Wizards About Us
scientologyreviews.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

scientologyreviews.com

Scientology Reviews home

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

201 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

173 ms

scientologyreviews.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Scientology Reviews content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about scientologyreviews.com

ScientologyReviews.com features consumer reviews on everything Scientology, books, lectures, courses, auditing, organizations and more.

Visit scientologyreviews.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Scientologyreviews.com page load time and found that the first response time was 201 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

scientologyreviews.com performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

52/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value350 ms

73/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.9 s

78/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

scientologyreviews.com

201 ms

scientologyreviews.com

2031 ms

rokbox.css

71 ms

grid-responsive.css

137 ms

master-8571adcbf377640be23c1b74dfbbd006.css

244 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Scientologyreviews.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Paypalobjects.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Scientologyreviews.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 202.6 kB (21%)

Content Size

973.9 kB

After Optimization

771.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Scientologyreviews.com main page is 973.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 532.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 40.2 kB

  • Original 47.0 kB
  • After minification 32.9 kB
  • After compression 6.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.1 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 58.5 kB

  • Original 532.5 kB
  • After minification 473.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Scientology Reviews needs image optimization as it can save up to 58.5 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 77.1 kB

  • Original 317.6 kB
  • After minification 317.5 kB
  • After compression 240.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 77.1 kB or 24% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 26.8 kB

  • Original 76.9 kB
  • After minification 76.8 kB
  • After compression 50.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Scientologyreviews.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.8 kB or 35% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (57%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

23

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Scientology Reviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

scientologyreviews.com

scientologyreviews.com

201 ms

scientologyreviews.com

scientologyreviews.com

2031 ms

rokbox.css

rokbox.css

71 ms

grid-responsive.css

grid-responsive.css

137 ms

master-8571adcbf377640be23c1b74dfbbd006.css

master-8571adcbf377640be23c1b74dfbbd006.css

244 ms

1200fixed.css

1200fixed.css

183 ms

fusionmenu.css

fusionmenu.css

184 ms

thirdparty-k2-8571adcbf377640be23c1b74dfbbd006.css

thirdparty-k2-8571adcbf377640be23c1b74dfbbd006.css

188 ms

jquery-ui-1.9.2.custom.css

jquery-ui-1.9.2.custom.css

190 ms

theme.css

theme.css

260 ms

jquery.treeview.css

jquery.treeview.css

248 ms

custom_styles_modules.css

custom_styles_modules.css

249 ms

custom_styles.css

custom_styles.css

249 ms

showcase.css

showcase.css

252 ms

mootools-core.js

mootools-core.js

366 ms

core.js

core.js

308 ms

caption.js

caption.js

310 ms

mootools-more.js

mootools-more.js

432 ms

rokbox.js

rokbox.js

381 ms

gantry-totop.js

gantry-totop.js

323 ms

browser-engines.js

browser-engines.js

380 ms

rokmediaqueries.js

rokmediaqueries.js

380 ms

fusion.js

fusion.js

387 ms

locale-en_GB.js

locale-en_GB.js

431 ms

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

497 ms

jquery-ui-1.9.2.custom.min.js

jquery-ui-1.9.2.custom.min.js

560 ms

jquery.ui.datepicker-en-GB.js

jquery.ui.datepicker-en-GB.js

470 ms

jreviews-ck.js

jreviews-ck.js

470 ms

jquery.treeview-ck.js

jquery.treeview-ck.js

506 ms

mootools-mobile.js

mootools-mobile.js

507 ms

rokmediaqueries.js

rokmediaqueries.js

507 ms

roksprocket.js

roksprocket.js

523 ms

moofx.js

moofx.js

577 ms

features.js

features.js

577 ms

showcase.js

showcase.js

582 ms

btn_donateCC_LG.gif

btn_donateCC_LG.gif

104 ms

top-bg-texture.jpg

top-bg-texture.jpg

141 ms

bottom-bg-texture.jpg

bottom-bg-texture.jpg

73 ms

menu-separator.png

menu-separator.png

80 ms

top-overlay.png

top-overlay.png

72 ms

scientology-reviews-logo.jpg

scientology-reviews-logo.jpg

74 ms

home.png

home.png

75 ms

crowd.png

crowd.png

194 ms

women.png

women.png

193 ms

couple.png

couple.png

194 ms

welcome-man.png

welcome-man.png

144 ms

thinking-women.png

thinking-women.png

144 ms

block-overlay-dark.png

block-overlay-dark.png

208 ms

independent-scientology-website.jpg

independent-scientology-website.jpg

208 ms

church-of-scientology-website.jpg

church-of-scientology-website.jpg

209 ms

couple-looking.png

couple-looking.png

312 ms

steve-hall-creative-logo.png

steve-hall-creative-logo.png

256 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

258 ms

treeview-default-line.gif

treeview-default-line.gif

285 ms

treeview-default.gif

treeview-default.gif

285 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

8 ms

Arvo-Regular-webfont.woff

Arvo-Regular-webfont.woff

273 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

322 ms

Accessibility Review

scientologyreviews.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

scientologyreviews.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

scientologyreviews.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Scientologyreviews.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Scientologyreviews.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

scientologyreviews.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Scientology Reviews. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: