Tools & Wizards About Us
scoreboardauto.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

scoreboardauto.com

Used Cars Eureka MO | Used Cars & Trucks MO | Scoreboard Automotive Sales and Leasing

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

173 ms

Resources Loaded

968 ms

Page Rendered

299 ms

scoreboardauto.com screenshot

About Website

Visit scoreboardauto.com now to see the best up-to-date Scoreboard Auto content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about scoreboardauto.com

Used Cars Eureka MO At Scoreboard Automotive Sales and Leasing, our customers can count on quality used cars, great prices, and a knowledgeable sales staff.

Visit scoreboardauto.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Scoreboardauto.com page load time and found that the first response time was 173 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

scoreboardauto.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

72/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value850 ms

34/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.124

83/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.1 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

scoreboardauto.com

173 ms

gtm.js

74 ms

widget.js

330 ms

39516.min.css

163 ms

js

136 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Scoreboardauto.com, 18% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 18% (3 requests) were made to Imagescdn.dealercarsearch.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (420 ms) relates to the external source Imagescdn.dealercarsearch.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 278.3 kB (24%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

868.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Scoreboardauto.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 547.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 49.1 kB

  • Original 60.5 kB
  • After minification 51.3 kB
  • After compression 11.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.2 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 44.9 kB

  • Original 547.3 kB
  • After minification 502.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Scoreboard Auto images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 115.2 kB

  • Original 371.1 kB
  • After minification 371.1 kB
  • After compression 255.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 115.2 kB or 31% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 69.1 kB

  • Original 167.8 kB
  • After minification 167.8 kB
  • After compression 98.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Scoreboardauto.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 69.1 kB or 41% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (46%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Scoreboard Auto. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

scoreboardauto.com

scoreboardauto.com

173 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

74 ms

widget.js

widget.js

330 ms

39516.min.css

39516.min.css

163 ms

js

js

136 ms

js

js

162 ms

39516.min.js

39516.min.js

212 ms

logo.png

logo.png

357 ms

partnermetrics.js

partnermetrics.js

136 ms

s66r_body_bg.jpg

s66r_body_bg.jpg

134 ms

s66r_header_bg.png

s66r_header_bg.png

133 ms

b1b82ca9.jpg

b1b82ca9.jpg

420 ms

638467869633257819.jpg

638467869633257819.jpg

298 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

207 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

257 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

192 ms

widget_app_1731405450658.js

widget_app_1731405450658.js

23 ms

Accessibility Review

scoreboardauto.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

scoreboardauto.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

scoreboardauto.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Scoreboardauto.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Scoreboardauto.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

scoreboardauto.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Scoreboard Auto. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: