7.1 sec in total
322 ms
5.8 sec
989 ms
Welcome to scoutcassiopea.org homepage info - get ready to check Scout CASSIOPEA best content right away, or after learning these important things about scoutcassiopea.org
Visit scoutcassiopea.orgWe analyzed Scoutcassiopea.org page load time and found that the first response time was 322 ms and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
scoutcassiopea.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value5.5 s
19/100
25%
Value8.1 s
21/100
10%
Value2,010 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.026
100/100
15%
Value7.8 s
44/100
10%
322 ms
4415 ms
449 ms
279 ms
212 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Scoutcassiopea.org, 5% (2 requests) were made to Static.addtoany.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Pbs.twimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Scoutcassiopea.org.
Page size can be reduced by 593.6 kB (66%)
904.3 kB
310.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Scoutcassiopea.org main page is 904.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 535.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 109.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 109.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Scout CASSIOPEA images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 394.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 394.3 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 85.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Scoutcassiopea.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 85.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (63%)
38
14
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Scout CASSIOPEA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
scoutcassiopea.org
322 ms
www.scoutcassiopea.org
4415 ms
style.css
449 ms
wpa.css
279 ms
style.css
212 ms
frontend_style.css
237 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
243 ms
mappress.css
359 ms
qtip.min.css
429 ms
default-calendar-grid.min.css
427 ms
addtoany.min.css
411 ms
styles.css
409 ms
uploadify.css
492 ms
jquery.js
701 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
608 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.4.pack.js
557 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
645 ms
frontend_script.js
588 ms
script.js
614 ms
swfobject.js
664 ms
jquery.uploadify.v2.1.4.min.js
694 ms
qtip.min.js
664 ms
default-calendar.min.js
458 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
476 ms
moment.js
693 ms
langs.min.js
943 ms
S-hvnNiG_normal.jpeg
93 ms
cropped-zona1-.jpg
294 ms
search.png
206 ms
comment-bubble.png
220 ms
facebook.png
350 ms
twitter.png
360 ms
google_plus.png
376 ms
email.png
381 ms
favicon.png
407 ms
rss.png
490 ms
page.js
25 ms
document.png
457 ms
simple-calendar.woff
522 ms
sm13.html
35 ms
ga.js
23 ms
scoutcassiopea.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
scoutcassiopea.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
scoutcassiopea.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
IT
IT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Scoutcassiopea.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Scoutcassiopea.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
scoutcassiopea.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Scout CASSIOPEA. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: