6 sec in total
740 ms
5.1 sec
183 ms
Click here to check amazing Screaming Frog content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about screamingfrog.co.uk
We run remarkably successful search engine optimisation (SEO) and paid search (PPC) campaigns using a unique blend of data, technology & creativity.
Visit screamingfrog.co.ukWe analyzed Screamingfrog.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 740 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
screamingfrog.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
11/100
10%
Value5.4 s
21/100
25%
Value8.4 s
19/100
10%
Value1,730 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.099
90/100
15%
Value14.4 s
9/100
10%
740 ms
175 ms
173 ms
39 ms
175 ms
Our browser made a total of 101 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Screamingfrog.co.uk, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Cm.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Screamingfrog.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (48%)
2.3 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Screamingfrog.co.uk main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 40.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Screaming Frog images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 844.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 844.6 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 167.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Screamingfrog.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 167.8 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 67 (72%)
93
26
The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screaming Frog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.screamingfrog.co.uk
740 ms
style.css
175 ms
animate.css
173 ms
css
39 ms
mediaqueries.css
175 ms
widget.css
185 ms
homeslider.css
185 ms
theme-my-login.css
185 ms
styles.css
339 ms
social_widget.css
340 ms
wptf.css
347 ms
pagenavi-css.css
349 ms
select2.css
353 ms
ajaxupload.css
356 ms
colorbox.css
506 ms
style.css
509 ms
jquery-ui.css
517 ms
jquery-1.3.2.min.js
603 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
527 ms
jquery.js
622 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
681 ms
force-zxcvbn.min.js
708 ms
js-admin.min.js
689 ms
zxcvbn-async.min.js
707 ms
buttons.js
61 ms
dashicons.min.css
877 ms
thickbox.css
855 ms
comment-reply.min.js
855 ms
jquery.watermark.js
881 ms
jquery.form.min.js
885 ms
scripts.js
1023 ms
new-customer.js
1032 ms
password-strength-meter.min.js
1045 ms
core.min.js
1058 ms
widget.min.js
1066 ms
colorbox.js
1196 ms
functions.js
1200 ms
wp-checkout.js
1221 ms
tabs.min.js
1072 ms
datepicker.min.js
1094 ms
button.min.js
1146 ms
autoheight.js
1198 ms
jquery.ddslick.js
1200 ms
select2.js
1316 ms
position.min.js
1078 ms
tooltip.min.js
1095 ms
thickbox.js
1156 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1201 ms
scripts.js
1200 ms
jquery.cookie.js
1228 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1102 ms
ga.js
31 ms
__utm.gif
70 ms
collect
55 ms
ga-audiences
50 ms
wordpress-seo-pager.php
931 ms
widgets.js
186 ms
logo.jpg
182 ms
slide.jpg
595 ms
semsmall.jpg
349 ms
seosmall.jpg
348 ms
ppcsmall.jpg
366 ms
seospidersmall.jpg
448 ms
socialsmall.jpg
450 ms
linksmall.jpg
681 ms
sf_client_which_alt.jpg
517 ms
sf_client_myoffers_alt.jpg
531 ms
sf_client_moo_alt.jpg
618 ms
sf_clients_namecheap_alt.jpg
621 ms
sf_client_churchill_alt.jpg
693 ms
facebook.png
703 ms
googleplus.png
763 ms
twitter.png
785 ms
linkedin.png
799 ms
rss.png
851 ms
search.jpg
860 ms
foot.jpg
950 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
32 ms
EFpQQyG9GqCrobXxL-KRMQFhaRv2pGgT5Kf0An0s4MM.woff
164 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
21 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
770 ms
overlay.png
785 ms
getSegment.php
17 ms
checkOAuth.esi
23 ms
t.dhj
77 ms
t.dhj
49 ms
cm
22 ms
s-3271.xgi
17 ms
17 ms
hbpix
141 ms
9 ms
pixel
19 ms
xrefid.xgi
8 ms
pixel
19 ms
2981
23 ms
zxcvbn.min.js
696 ms
chartbeat.js
39 ms
ping
7 ms
index.a8fc48294ca4cc10eb440189d9f22d7c.html
10 ms
buttons.ab966a004186897711de4a5ed256c924.css
18 ms
st.125da8bfe70ad3e00a35a6e4c65d8bc5.js
22 ms
screamingfrog.co.uk accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
screamingfrog.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
screamingfrog.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screamingfrog.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Screamingfrog.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
screamingfrog.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Screaming Frog. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: