Report Summary

  • 60

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

screenagers.com

screenagers & the incredible machine

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

334 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

142 ms

screenagers.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Screenagers content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about screenagers.com

Wir entwickeln Business-Konzepte für die digitale Welt.

Visit screenagers.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Screenagers.com page load time and found that the first response time was 334 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

screenagers.com performance score

60

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

79/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

95/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value660 ms

45/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.013

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

reasons.screenagers.com

334 ms

main.css

98 ms

rgbcolor.js

189 ms

canvg.js

294 ms

jquery.min.js

303 ms

Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Screenagers.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (882 ms) relates to the external source Reasons.screenagers.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 307.9 kB (59%)

Content Size

524.9 kB

After Optimization

217.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Screenagers.com main page is 524.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 365.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 22.0 kB

  • Original 28.1 kB
  • After minification 25.2 kB
  • After compression 6.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.0 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 8.8 kB

  • Original 122.1 kB
  • After minification 113.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Screenagers images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 270.2 kB

  • Original 365.8 kB
  • After minification 286.4 kB
  • After compression 95.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 270.2 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 8.9 kB
  • After minification 6.7 kB
  • After compression 2.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Screenagers.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.9 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (7%)

Requests Now

91

After Optimization

85

The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screenagers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

screenagers.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Best Practices

screenagers.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

screenagers.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screenagers.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Screenagers.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Screenagers. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: