3.2 sec in total
380 ms
2.4 sec
412 ms
Visit screenagers.pl now to see the best up-to-date Screenagers content for Poland and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about screenagers.pl
screenagers.pl
Visit screenagers.plWe analyzed Screenagers.pl page load time and found that the first response time was 380 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
screenagers.pl performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
63/100
10%
Value24.2 s
0/100
25%
Value6.3 s
42/100
10%
Value2,980 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.183
66/100
15%
Value15.6 s
6/100
10%
380 ms
95 ms
174 ms
175 ms
178 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Screenagers.pl, 8% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Stat.4u.pl.
Page size can be reduced by 442.8 kB (50%)
887.3 kB
444.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Screenagers.pl main page is 887.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 301.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Screenagers images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 150.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 150.6 kB or 55% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 253.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Screenagers.pl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 253.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (44%)
41
23
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screenagers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
screenagers.pl
380 ms
design.css
95 ms
date.js
174 ms
autocomplete.css
175 ms
jquery.js
178 ms
dimensions.js
175 ms
autocomplete.js
239 ms
review.css
187 ms
s.js
361 ms
ga.js
60 ms
s4u.gif
222 ms
logo.gif
117 ms
rss.gif
118 ms
fb.gif
112 ms
KEN.jpg
350 ms
malpa-mow200i.jpg
185 ms
ps.jpg
114 ms
baner%202015.jpg
181 ms
baner%202015.jpg
194 ms
WESTER.jpg
189 ms
newzealand.jpg
261 ms
FOR%20YOUR%20PASEK.jpg
260 ms
rekrutacja%201614.png
352 ms
rycerzyki_trasa64%20(1).jpg
401 ms
matt_elliott_64.jpg
400 ms
tNM_1614.jpg
462 ms
coo64.jpg
346 ms
respublica.jpg
466 ms
agb-oFZjuGM
199 ms
embed.spotify.com
437 ms
__utm.gif
27 ms
s.cgi
1640 ms
www-embed-player-vflRGs1ko.css
139 ms
www-embed-player.js
194 ms
base.js
328 ms
418 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
73 ms
ad_status.js
92 ms
CrYjSnGjrRCn0pd9VQsnFOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.woff
137 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUbO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
137 ms
embed
357 ms
analytics.js
97 ms
token
122 ms
circular-light.woff
99 ms
collect
31 ms
collect
79 ms
ga-audiences
17 ms
7be675ac4ffea5f610d0bf4a8d2234dbfa0dfce3b2af8e7c4d1734ae089142a59d9c0a12c4511349c2825559a4a1ffba965daf410346315c7f1c65cdc5329187b7cc8f8721ba4ac56d91fc25415b07d4
35 ms
screenagers.pl accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
screenagers.pl best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
screenagers.pl SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
PL
PL
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screenagers.pl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Polish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Screenagers.pl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
screenagers.pl
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Screenagers. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: