4 sec in total
354 ms
3 sec
720 ms
Welcome to screenbid.com homepage info - get ready to check Screenbid best content for Australia right away, or after learning these important things about screenbid.com
Visit screenbid.comWe analyzed Screenbid.com page load time and found that the first response time was 354 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
screenbid.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value10.2 s
0/100
25%
Value4.7 s
69/100
10%
Value270 ms
82/100
30%
Value0.779
5/100
15%
Value16.0 s
6/100
10%
354 ms
26 ms
25 ms
28 ms
10 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Screenbid.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.rawgit.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (800 ms) relates to the external source Stats.g.doubleclick.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (39%)
3.9 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Screenbid.com main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 78.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Screenbid images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 939.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 939.8 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 438.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Screenbid.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 438.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (46%)
84
45
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screenbid. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.screenbid.com
354 ms
cloudflare.min.js
26 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
25 ms
prettyPhoto.css
28 ms
wp-video-lightbox.css
10 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
60 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
60 ms
rgs.css
22 ms
font-awesome.min.css
23 ms
style.css
31 ms
responsive.css
61 ms
orbit.css
71 ms
js_composer.css
83 ms
wp-featherlight.min.css
71 ms
www.screenbid.com
660 ms
jquery.js
90 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
80 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
88 ms
video-lightbox.js
88 ms
modernizr.js
90 ms
ProgressCircle.js
89 ms
jquery.vc_chart.js
90 ms
jquery-latest.js
77 ms
featherlight.gallery.min.css
77 ms
featherlight.gallery.min.js
78 ms
respond.js
22 ms
nicescroll.js
9 ms
sticky.js
9 ms
prettyPhoto.js
10 ms
isotope.min.js
11 ms
superfish.js
13 ms
init.js
20 ms
orbit.js
13 ms
infinitescroll.js
11 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
17 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
17 ms
wpFeatherlight.pkgd.min.js
19 ms
wp-embed.min.js
19 ms
js_composer_front.js
19 ms
logo-2.png
72 ms
32057_0.jpg
74 ms
103_0-500x403.jpg
70 ms
jax-blue-harley.jpg
74 ms
20153_0-500x400.jpg
78 ms
1595_0-600x365-1.jpg
74 ms
101_0-500x403.jpg
74 ms
559_0-500x403.jpg
83 ms
111_0-1.png
74 ms
8538_0-1.jpg
69 ms
8036_0-600x403-1.jpg
71 ms
83_0-500x403.jpg
69 ms
560_0-500x403.jpg
72 ms
20081_0.jpg
69 ms
333_0-500x403.jpg
76 ms
9358_0-500x403.jpg
74 ms
8073_9.jpg
84 ms
116_0-500x403.jpg
80 ms
7401_0-500x403-1.png
77 ms
1651_0.jpg
74 ms
563_0-500x403.jpg
74 ms
Screenbid-Logo-white.png
76 ms
mini-banners-1.jpg
77 ms
sdk.js
77 ms
logo1.png
68 ms
ga.js
68 ms
analytics.js
68 ms
loading.gif
64 ms
transparent.png
60 ms
__utm.gif
25 ms
collect
800 ms
collect
672 ms
collect
106 ms
664 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
84 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
79 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff
82 ms
OpenSansBold-webfont.woff
85 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
81 ms
icomoon.woff
82 ms
Screenbid-Mad-Men.jpg
279 ms
Screenbid-justified.jpg
571 ms
Screenbid-Californication.jpg
541 ms
Screenbid-True-Blood.jpg
556 ms
Screenbid-Sons-of-Anarchy.jpg
543 ms
Screenbid-Boardwalk-Empire.jpg
541 ms
Screenbid-Psych.jpg
552 ms
Screenbid-Breaking_Bad.jpg
540 ms
ScreenBid_Under-The-Dome_Banner-1.jpg
552 ms
xd_arbiter.php
478 ms
xd_arbiter.php
497 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
253 ms
slider-arrows.png
31 ms
slider-arrows-shadows.png
35 ms
screenbid.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
screenbid.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
screenbid.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screenbid.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Screenbid.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
screenbid.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Screenbid. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: