Tools & Wizards About Us
screendream.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

screendream.de

ScreenDream | ThomasHelzle - Analog and Digital Art and Design - Berlin

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

261 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

58 ms

screendream.de screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Screen Dream content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about screendream.de

I'm working as an artist with a multitude of media, from wood and clay through 3D and CAD to interactive, digital realtime animation and installations with sound and music.

Visit screendream.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Screendream.de page load time and found that the first response time was 261 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

screendream.de performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

82/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

62/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

screendream.de

261 ms

screendream.de

1122 ms

blocks.min.css

114 ms

blocks.min.js

212 ms

main_pages.css

312 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Screendream.de and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Screendream.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 18.5 kB (1%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

3.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Screendream.de main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 16.2 kB

  • Original 19.6 kB
  • After minification 11.4 kB
  • After compression 3.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.2 kB, which is 42% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 392 B

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 3.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Screen Dream images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 168 B

  • Original 64.1 kB
  • After minification 64.1 kB
  • After compression 64.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 13.1 kB
  • After minification 13.1 kB
  • After compression 11.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Screendream.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.7 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (25%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screen Dream. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

screendream.de

screendream.de

261 ms

screendream.de

screendream.de

1122 ms

blocks.min.css

blocks.min.css

114 ms

blocks.min.js

blocks.min.js

212 ms

main_pages.css

main_pages.css

312 ms

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

429 ms

anime.min.js

anime.min.js

314 ms

galleria.min.js

galleria.min.js

441 ms

galleria.classic.min.js

galleria.classic.min.js

318 ms

LayeredSpiral_Text.jpg

LayeredSpiral_Text.jpg

489 ms

DragonClose.jpg

DragonClose.jpg

310 ms

Torriander.jpg

Torriander.jpg

734 ms

DualTwister.jpg

DualTwister.jpg

513 ms

SpiralingCradle.jpg

SpiralingCradle.jpg

515 ms

CoralGrowth3.jpg

CoralGrowth3.jpg

694 ms

TheTree.jpg

TheTree.jpg

730 ms

arrowsi.svg

arrowsi.svg

588 ms

moon15__-webfont.woff

moon15__-webfont.woff

579 ms

moon00__-webfont.woff

moon00__-webfont.woff

569 ms

dosis-light-webfont.woff

dosis-light-webfont.woff

658 ms

dosis-extralight-webfont.woff

dosis-extralight-webfont.woff

693 ms

dosis-regular-webfont.woff

dosis-regular-webfont.woff

691 ms

dosis-medium-webfont.woff

dosis-medium-webfont.woff

746 ms

dosis-semibold-webfont.woff

dosis-semibold-webfont.woff

778 ms

dosis-bold-webfont.woff

dosis-bold-webfont.woff

780 ms

dosis-extrabold-webfont.woff

dosis-extrabold-webfont.woff

797 ms

galleria.classic.css

galleria.classic.css

793 ms

Accessibility Review

screendream.de accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

screendream.de best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

screendream.de SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document doesn't have a valid hreflang

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screendream.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Screendream.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

screendream.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Screen Dream. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: