Tools & Wizards About Us
screenenclosurepainters.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 9

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

screenenclosurepainters.com

Premium Domain Names at already Discounted Prices - screenenclosurepainters.com is available for sale! Make an Offer Today. 777

Page Load Speed

10.2 sec in total

First Response

269 ms

Resources Loaded

7.2 sec

Page Rendered

2.8 sec

screenenclosurepainters.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to screenenclosurepainters.com homepage info - get ready to check Screenenclosurepainters best content right away, or after learning these important things about screenenclosurepainters.com

Search premium discount domains and check out the Domain Deal of the Day.

Visit screenenclosurepainters.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Screenenclosurepainters.com page load time and found that the first response time was 269 ms and then it took 10 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

screenenclosurepainters.com performance score

9

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value25,040 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.223

56/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value34.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

screenenclosurepainters.com

269 ms

screenenclosurepainters.com

4408 ms

autoptimize_2c2da583b56ed1f082595e118addcaa5.css

215 ms

css

53 ms

jquery.js

407 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Screenenclosurepainters.com, 14% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Screenenclosurepainters.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (49%)

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Screenenclosurepainters.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 74.0 kB

  • Original 89.4 kB
  • After minification 89.4 kB
  • After compression 15.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 10.6 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Screenenclosurepainters images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 296.2 kB

  • Original 420.6 kB
  • After minification 420.6 kB
  • After compression 124.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 296.2 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 1.5 MB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB
  • After compression 176.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Screenenclosurepainters.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 90% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (41%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screenenclosurepainters. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

screenenclosurepainters.com

screenenclosurepainters.com

269 ms

screenenclosurepainters.com

screenenclosurepainters.com

4408 ms

autoptimize_2c2da583b56ed1f082595e118addcaa5.css

autoptimize_2c2da583b56ed1f082595e118addcaa5.css

215 ms

css

css

53 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

407 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

164 ms

autoptimize_4ab5b9b0a6e11f439ddf55533e197f5e.js

autoptimize_4ab5b9b0a6e11f439ddf55533e197f5e.js

549 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

419 ms

JPM-Jacksonville-Pool-Enclosures.jpg

JPM-Jacksonville-Pool-Enclosures.jpg

1646 ms

real-estate.jpg

real-estate.jpg

1234 ms

preloader-1.gif

preloader-1.gif

1233 ms

Jax-Beach-FL-Pool-Enclosure-Restoration.jpg

Jax-Beach-FL-Pool-Enclosure-Restoration.jpg

1634 ms

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3aPA.woff

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3aPA.woff

987 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zAkw.woff

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zAkw.woff

1388 ms

ElegantIcons.woff

ElegantIcons.woff

1386 ms

thegem-socials.ttf

thegem-socials.ttf

1386 ms

montserrat-ultralight.woff

montserrat-ultralight.woff

1626 ms

thegem-icons.woff

thegem-icons.woff

1624 ms

JTURjIg1_i6t8kCHKm45_dJE7g0.woff

JTURjIg1_i6t8kCHKm45_dJE7g0.woff

1396 ms

JTUSjIg1_i6t8kCHKm45xW0.woff

JTUSjIg1_i6t8kCHKm45xW0.woff

1396 ms

materialdesignicons.woff

materialdesignicons.woff

1626 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1626 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

1552 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

642 ms

collect

collect

269 ms

collect

collect

498 ms

thegem-touch.css

thegem-touch.css

230 ms

thegem-effects-disabled.css

thegem-effects-disabled.css

229 ms

logo_005e79883d3d3f1c8e53b1d47fa1ab1c_1x.png

logo_005e79883d3d3f1c8e53b1d47fa1ab1c_1x.png

128 ms

Accessibility Review

screenenclosurepainters.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

screenenclosurepainters.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

screenenclosurepainters.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screenenclosurepainters.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Screenenclosurepainters.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

screenenclosurepainters.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Screenenclosurepainters. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: