Tools & Wizards About Us
screenflex.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

screenflex.com

#1 Portable Room Dividers & Partition Walls | Screenflex

Page Load Speed

7.7 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

1.8 sec

screenflex.com screenshot

About Website

Visit screenflex.com now to see the best up-to-date Screenflex content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about screenflex.com

Discover an expansive selection from Screenflex, ranging from dynamic room dividers and soundproof partitions to versatile portable walls, folding office partitions, and innovative acoustic solutions,...

Visit screenflex.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Screenflex.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

screenflex.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

29/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.0 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value22,890 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.076

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value32.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

screenflex.com

1298 ms

www.screenflex.com

162 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

34 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

70 ms

frontend.js

102 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Screenflex.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Screenflex.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 99.7 kB (18%)

Content Size

558.1 kB

After Optimization

458.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Screenflex.com main page is 558.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 274.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 97.2 kB

  • Original 126.6 kB
  • After minification 126.5 kB
  • After compression 29.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.2 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 203 B

  • Original 274.9 kB
  • After minification 274.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Screenflex images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 123.6 kB
  • After minification 123.6 kB
  • After compression 122.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 636 B

  • Original 32.9 kB
  • After minification 32.9 kB
  • After compression 32.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Screenflex.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (40%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

44

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screenflex. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

screenflex.com

screenflex.com

1298 ms

www.screenflex.com

www.screenflex.com

162 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

34 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

70 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

102 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

113 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

102 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

44 ms

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

322 ms

application-vendor.js

application-vendor.js

322 ms

application.js

application.js

327 ms

front-page.js

front-page.js

320 ms

jquery.livechat.min.js

jquery.livechat.min.js

320 ms

v652eace1692a40cfa3763df669d7439c1639079717194

v652eace1692a40cfa3763df669d7439c1639079717194

379 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

308 ms

phone.svg

phone.svg

145 ms

new_web_hero-750x350-1.jpg

new_web_hero-750x350-1.jpg

146 ms

bg-texture.svg

bg-texture.svg

138 ms

Money-Back-2.svg

Money-Back-2.svg

136 ms

quieter-1.svg

quieter-1.svg

142 ms

folds-flat.svg

folds-flat.svg

139 ms

tack.svg

tack.svg

189 ms

caster.svg

caster.svg

186 ms

fast_ship.svg

fast_ship.svg

183 ms

lady-bg.png

lady-bg.png

245 ms

room-divider-1-2-configuration.jpg

room-divider-1-2-configuration.jpg

197 ms

room-divider-s-configuration.jpg

room-divider-s-configuration.jpg

210 ms

room-divider-straight-configuration.jpg

room-divider-straight-configuration.jpg

197 ms

room-divider-plus-configuration.jpg

room-divider-plus-configuration.jpg

208 ms

room-divider-split-u-configuration.jpg

room-divider-split-u-configuration.jpg

210 ms

room-divider-l-configuration.jpg

room-divider-l-configuration.jpg

240 ms

room-divider-t-configuration.jpg

room-divider-t-configuration.jpg

274 ms

room-divider-curve-configuration.jpg

room-divider-curve-configuration.jpg

246 ms

room-divider-u-configuation.jpg

room-divider-u-configuation.jpg

242 ms

display-market.jpg

display-market.jpg

240 ms

office-web.jpg

office-web.jpg

268 ms

education-market.jpg

education-market.jpg

221 ms

market-clear.jpg

market-clear.jpg

222 ms

hospital-screens.jpg

hospital-screens.jpg

412 ms

girlsdance.jpg

girlsdance.jpg

340 ms

hospitality-blue-web.jpg

hospitality-blue-web.jpg

249 ms

small-religious-purple.jpg

small-religious-purple.jpg

251 ms

Logo-Creighton.png

Logo-Creighton.png

268 ms

Logo-Philips.png

Logo-Philips.png

266 ms

Logo-NOLA-.png

Logo-NOLA-.png

324 ms

Logo-Saddleback-Church.png

Logo-Saddleback-Church.png

300 ms

Logo-Boeing.png

Logo-Boeing.png

419 ms

amnh-white.png

amnh-white.png

360 ms

deerpark-1.png

deerpark-1.png

1329 ms

sf-proto.php

sf-proto.php

1343 ms

sedgebrook.jpg

sedgebrook.jpg

1330 ms

shasta-county-childrens-logo.jpg

shasta-county-childrens-logo.jpg

1270 ms

New-Brunsel-Church-of-Christ.jpg

New-Brunsel-Church-of-Christ.jpg

1314 ms

display-tower-university.jpg

display-tower-university.jpg

1267 ms

Looking-For-Something-Specific-Popup.jpg

Looking-For-Something-Specific-Popup.jpg

1315 ms

livechat-icon.png

livechat-icon.png

1314 ms

bat.js

bat.js

1189 ms

8nq5t3xn6y

8nq5t3xn6y

1210 ms

js

js

222 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

1170 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

91 ms

collect

collect

34 ms

clarity.js

clarity.js

34 ms

application.css

application.css

49 ms

collect

collect

156 ms

gfonts.css

gfonts.css

194 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

292 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

421 ms

collect

collect

284 ms

st.js

st.js

296 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

293 ms

614749252274689

614749252274689

65 ms

182 ms

c.gif

c.gif

42 ms

21 ms

Accessibility Review

screenflex.com accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

screenflex.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

screenflex.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screenflex.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Screenflex.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

screenflex.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Screenflex. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: