Tools & Wizards About Us
screening4life.us screenshot

Report Summary

  • 66

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    21% of websites

screening4life.us

Home

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

126 ms

Resources Loaded

863 ms

Page Rendered

111 ms

screening4life.us screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Screening 4 Life content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about screening4life.us

Screening 4 Life (S4L) offers a range of services from Diagnostic Ultrasound and Portable X-Ray to 3D/4D Fetal Sonography and Preventive Health Screenings.

Visit screening4life.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Screening4life.us page load time and found that the first response time was 126 ms and then it took 974 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

screening4life.us performance score

66

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

34/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

74/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.4 s

72/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

screening4life.us

126 ms

sites.css

11 ms

fancybox.css

20 ms

main_style.css

59 ms

font.css

20 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 34% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Screening4life.us, 29% (12 requests) were made to Cdn2.editmysite.com and 20% (8 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (454 ms) belongs to the original domain Screening4life.us.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 25.7 kB (2%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Screening4life.us main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 927.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 23.8 kB

  • Original 30.4 kB
  • After minification 29.9 kB
  • After compression 6.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 927.2 kB
  • After minification 926.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Screening 4 Life images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 568 B

  • Original 405.0 kB
  • After minification 405.0 kB
  • After compression 404.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 303 B

  • Original 35.2 kB
  • After minification 35.2 kB
  • After compression 34.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Screening4life.us has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (47%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screening 4 Life. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

screening4life.us

screening4life.us

126 ms

sites.css

sites.css

11 ms

fancybox.css

fancybox.css

20 ms

main_style.css

main_style.css

59 ms

font.css

font.css

20 ms

slideshow.css

slideshow.css

21 ms

templateArtifacts.js

templateArtifacts.js

115 ms

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

28 ms

stl.js

stl.js

19 ms

main.js

main.js

21 ms

slideshow-jq.js

slideshow-jq.js

21 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

287 ms

main-customer-accounts-site.js

main-customer-accounts-site.js

24 ms

ppbutton.png

ppbutton.png

319 ms

ga.js

ga.js

74 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

17 ms

backgroundo.jpg

backgroundo.jpg

70 ms

background_header2.jpg

background_header2.jpg

131 ms

button_large_highlight.png

button_large_highlight.png

128 ms

_7511853.png

_7511853.png

130 ms

apda.png

apda.png

192 ms

ourpassion_orig.png

ourpassion_orig.png

136 ms

4643150_orig.png

4643150_orig.png

454 ms

8903685_orig.png

8903685_orig.png

412 ms

4597753_orig.png

4597753_orig.png

420 ms

7779983_orig.png

7779983_orig.png

368 ms

pofbutton.png

pofbutton.png

158 ms

298 ms

bold.woff

bold.woff

19 ms

regular.woff

regular.woff

19 ms

likebox.php

likebox.php

170 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

14 ms

FynAKRG5V_p.css

FynAKRG5V_p.css

21 ms

PsN7z1yfDJ7.js

PsN7z1yfDJ7.js

29 ms

0bWEtGbW7yi.js

0bWEtGbW7yi.js

50 ms

KQ9hZo1cCms.js

KQ9hZo1cCms.js

51 ms

jSnkebxg-Sx.js

jSnkebxg-Sx.js

50 ms

p55HfXW__mM.js

p55HfXW__mM.js

51 ms

305319128_422544603201332_4363657882007071163_n.jpg

305319128_422544603201332_4363657882007071163_n.jpg

21 ms

Eis4gdIzr4y.js

Eis4gdIzr4y.js

6 ms

UXtr_j2Fwe-.png

UXtr_j2Fwe-.png

6 ms

Accessibility Review

screening4life.us accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

screening4life.us best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

screening4life.us SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screening4life.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Screening4life.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

screening4life.us

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Screening 4 Life. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: