5.4 sec in total
1.1 sec
3.9 sec
390 ms
Click here to check amazing Screenings content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about screenings.io
The domain name screenings.io is for sale. Make an offer or buy it now at a set price.
Visit screenings.ioWe analyzed Screenings.io page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
screenings.io performance score
1102 ms
234 ms
903 ms
176 ms
788 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 17% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Screenings.io, 34% (16 requests) were made to Pbs.twimg.com and 21% (10 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Screenings.io.
Page size can be reduced by 243.0 kB (32%)
759.8 kB
516.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Screenings.io main page is 759.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 528.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 148.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 148.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 63.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Screenings needs image optimization as it can save up to 63.0 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 60% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
32
32
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screenings. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
screenings.io
1102 ms
8c6bedfb04b1390b003b3216faeebbec2281d803.css
234 ms
b143a272450015888279e3b26dc70a84cd1464b8.js
903 ms
nrj8ldi.js
176 ms
f
788 ms
analytics.js
621 ms
screenings.png
774 ms
crop
392 ms
vincent_200x200.jpg
505 ms
acyyi2e91ro4sbuo0lnq.jpg
391 ms
default_profile_1_200x200.png
389 ms
loading-balls.svg
153 ms
loading.svg
270 ms
wysvgo0txsjmgblkept1.jpg
112 ms
pia55zqbz6smt3milipg.jpg
111 ms
j8ehsrukq7v6bh6tswfc_200x200.png
170 ms
YOrO7gt8_200x200.png
201 ms
BvAeMxtp_200x200.jpeg
279 ms
DV8ZVo71_200x200.jpeg
349 ms
Fv3Zs-v2_200x200.jpg
209 ms
henna_200x200.jpg
202 ms
pill-square_200x200.png
253 ms
v4chjr8yxaiqgclqnyyo_200x200.png
279 ms
g_sp6xzQ_200x200.jpeg
348 ms
_o3L6A6X_200x200.png
280 ms
xm9nw2K5_200x200.jpg
346 ms
F6BFbUn2_200x200.jpg
343 ms
benPortrait_200x200.png
348 ms
sjS_5QCO_200x200.jpg
406 ms
nnwL9Tfw_200x200.jpeg
412 ms
crop
104 ms
crop
147 ms
crop
180 ms
crop
145 ms
crop
147 ms
crop
144 ms
info
200 ms
collect
18 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
400 ms
ORle1IOiQsXM92Pg-SAwrTVgtHuBPa7UKEc9U1B8qo3ff4f9gsMdeMI6MK6g5MFfb2iRZeFKF2sKZQsyFhsK526aFhZcjQmRw2M3FhJtZebtFRmKwh4KjDwtwD6DwAZ8wcmywQSaZRjkwR9ajQqU5QI.eot
184 ms
m3vdghT01jkfgk-lNZCz8NnEvN_Zfj1miXOXjtnrfpSff4P9gsMdeMI6MK6g5MZfb2iRZeFKF2sKZQsyFhsK526aFhZcjQmRw2M3FhJtZebtFRmKwh4KjDwtwD6DwAZ8wcmywQSaZRjkwR9ajQqU5QI.eot
307 ms
b5k3MZmwPm9ABca7uCnULCLavPGDOBe2EhSQYX8O8FSff4e9gsMdeMI6MK6g5Mufb2iRZeFKF2sKZQsyFhsK526aFhZcjQmRw2M3FhJtZebtFRmKwh4KjDwtwD6DwAZ8wcmywQSaZRjkwR9ajQqU5QI.eot
314 ms
U6CgejqJilSxDIKGRT7g2M5On-cX_lky4KmC28_buJwff4A9gsMdeMI6MK6g5ggfb2iRZeFKF2sKZQsyFhsK526aFhZcjQmRw2M3FhJtZebtFRmKwh4KjDwtwD6DwAZ8wcmywQSaZRjkwR9ajQqU5QI.eot
316 ms
auZjGTjI1eyrgLVICX65t51sM1_aXudLorZocCTBgnMff4e9gsMdeMI6MK6g5MX.eot
315 ms
ImYrEtuljixQm0dn9to2jrenSlXTcf0H5GFgRGWYucqff4A9gsMdeMI6MK6g5gM.eot
315 ms
y3U8n4xK2-yUTnpC4YZtP_1EDSe45Qs7EIjBBhd0cc3ff4f9gsMdeMI6MK6g5Mw.eot
242 ms
a-F3tS2JkriccWmtonqID3RjtDhom2Gxx5lxYrV481Xff4P9gsMdeMI6MK6g5Mj.eot
543 ms
screenings.io SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screenings.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Screenings.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
screenings.io
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Screenings. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: