9.7 sec in total
1.8 sec
7.7 sec
190 ms
Click here to check amazing Screenlevel content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about screenlevel.com
Website Design Companies Halifax - Let’s build your perfect website. We'll show you how easily a well designed website fits your advertising budget, and improves your bottom line. Give us a call ...
Visit screenlevel.comWe analyzed Screenlevel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 7.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
screenlevel.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.8 s
0/100
10%
Value11.2 s
0/100
25%
Value11.9 s
4/100
10%
Value200 ms
90/100
30%
Value0.251
49/100
15%
Value12.5 s
14/100
10%
1793 ms
127 ms
125 ms
172 ms
33 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Screenlevel.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Screenlevel.com.
Page size can be reduced by 967.3 kB (64%)
1.5 MB
545.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Screenlevel.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 626.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 60.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 40.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Screenlevel needs image optimization as it can save up to 40.4 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 456.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 456.6 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 410.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Screenlevel.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 410.2 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (68%)
34
11
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screenlevel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.screenlevel.com
1793 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
127 ms
styles.css
125 ms
wp_head.css
172 ms
css
33 ms
css
44 ms
style.css
402 ms
shortcodes.css
210 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
182 ms
magnific_popup.css
165 ms
jquery.js
328 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
206 ms
api.js
38 ms
frontend-builder-global-functions.js
122 ms
jquery.form.min.js
134 ms
scripts.js
159 ms
jquery.mobile.custom.min.js
160 ms
custom.js
249 ms
smoothscroll.js
185 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
227 ms
waypoints.min.js
223 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
229 ms
frontend-builder-scripts.js
454 ms
wp_footer.js
272 ms
wp-embed.min.js
278 ms
lg-1.png
86 ms
logo_footer.png
243 ms
slidersection2.jpg
222 ms
slidersection3.jpg
322 ms
footerbg2.jpg
288 ms
slider1.jpg
300 ms
screenlevelicon96x96-2.png
61 ms
screenlevelicon96x96-3.png
60 ms
slidersection1.jpg
112 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
55 ms
modules.ttf
146 ms
recaptcha__de.js
55 ms
screenlevel.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
screenlevel.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
screenlevel.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screenlevel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Screenlevel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
screenlevel.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Screenlevel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: