2.3 sec in total
29 ms
1.8 sec
470 ms
Click here to check amazing Screenlight content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about screenlight.tv
Freelancer friendly, enterprise ready video review and approval. Start on our Free Forever plan and grow into an enterprise plan as your business grows.
Visit screenlight.tvWe analyzed Screenlight.tv page load time and found that the first response time was 29 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
screenlight.tv performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value11.7 s
0/100
10%
Value20.3 s
0/100
25%
Value22.0 s
0/100
10%
Value10,050 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.061
97/100
15%
Value23.7 s
1/100
10%
29 ms
168 ms
256 ms
102 ms
155 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 11% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Screenlight.tv, 32% (18 requests) were made to Static1.squarespace.com and 12% (7 requests) were made to Use.typekit.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (662 ms) relates to the external source Use.typekit.com.
Page size can be reduced by 367.4 kB (22%)
1.7 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Screenlight.tv main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 136.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 136.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 198.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Screenlight needs image optimization as it can save up to 198.7 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 30.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 30.8 kB or 11% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Screenlight.tv needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.0 kB or 40% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (59%)
44
18
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screenlight. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
screenlight.tv
29 ms
screenlight.tv
168 ms
knj3mgv.js
256 ms
css
102 ms
site.css
155 ms
jquery.min.js
135 ms
oct.js
162 ms
popover-v1.js
200 ms
E-v1.js
139 ms
130 ms
matchHeight.js
50 ms
fitvids.js
52 ms
iframeResizer.js
53 ms
iframeResizer_contentWindow.js
16 ms
screenlight.tv
98 ms
common-0437e51819dd863618ab-min.js
242 ms
commerce-1d13bdbc93aaacbb9cbd-min.js
178 ms
commerce-2b4a0593bca72ff9bd48bd03804b62b2-min.css
154 ms
analytics.js
399 ms
fbevents.js
611 ms
adsct
463 ms
adsct
462 ms
32 ms
i.js
367 ms
6c8764801dafd70149b215d9f3441891bf6b9bd4.2.js
553 ms
LeFlHvsZjXu2c3ZRgBq9nKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
444 ms
PIbvSEyHEdL91QLOQRnZ14nF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
469 ms
-wWnYC4YcPyRuZ-C1HKIDuNjaXGyufqDJVUD40Ps5VCffVeugsMdeMJ6Mk6gw6NuSh90iY83ZAlTifoRdhXtMq4MFhFqjhJXFe48FeIaZeJt52SaZcZyFAw3w2MajRyqZ26hFAJDjc4RwD6D52wUZc9kZAIUFDicFRJkFQiy5QIowb.woff
337 ms
Ypfgc2c4wENXIagQNIvY4DuHikhonhY2p9Ps8VyUU9Cff57ugsMdeMJ6Mk6gw6NuSh90iY83ZAlTifoRdhXtgI4MFhFqjhJXFe48FeIaZeJt52SaZcZyFAw3w2MajRyqZ26hFAJDjc4RwD6D52wUZc9kZAIUFDicFRJkFQiy5QIowb.woff
587 ms
PsaEY2ebJAhIa290HKufXbXojYZ01r_2Z8rXVZQY2Swff5KugsMdeMJ6Mk6gw6NuSh90iY83ZAlTifoRdhXtgX4MFhFqjhJXFe48FeIaZeJt52SaZcZyFAw3w2MajRyqZ26hFAJDjc4RwD6D52wUZc9kZAIUFDicFRJkFQiy5QIowb.woff
662 ms
6rYv84POalfstX0SkMI-EvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
494 ms
Vu9Dx8oyiuqEkuIyR3OPDQ.ttf
522 ms
iframe_shim
350 ms
home_play.png
314 ms
8B4E756861C7DC2C.jpg
379 ms
8B4E756861C7DC2D.jpg
382 ms
social-accounts.svg
346 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
32 ms
screenlight_logos_cisco.jpg
41 ms
41 ms
screenlight_logos_lifelock.jpg
40 ms
screenlight_logos_oreilly.jpg
41 ms
40 ms
77 ms
pSe2ne-RxGajzlfkY48ipD0g5bBe6Bevghs1nQti96vff50ugsMdeMJ6Mk6gw6NuSh90iY83ZAlTifoRdhXt2q4MFhFqjhJXFe48FeIaZeJt52SaZcZyFAw3w2MajRyqZ26hFAJDjc4RwD6D52wUZc9kZAIUFDicFRJkFQiy5QIowb.woff
353 ms
KPgx_fCYQFOny5MnA2TK53U9p8mOfG2mzNnA0UXkDUwff5cugsMdeMJ6Mk6gw6NuSh90iY83ZAlTifoRdhXtI94MFhFqjhJXFe48FeIaZeJt52SaZcZyFAw3w2MajRyqZ26hFAJDjc4RwD6D52wUZc9kZAIUFDicFRJkFQiy5QIowb.woff
375 ms
collect
50 ms
p.gif
196 ms
screenlight.tv
21 ms
mobile_header2.jpg
187 ms
e
37 ms
e
25 ms
e
23 ms
122 ms
Screen+Shot+2015-08-11+at+3.32.12+PM.png
65 ms
screenlight_testimonial_homepage.jpg
42 ms
prefooter_bg.jpg
18 ms
screenlight.tv accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
screenlight.tv best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
screenlight.tv SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screenlight.tv can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Screenlight.tv main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
screenlight.tv
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Screenlight. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: