2.9 sec in total
76 ms
1.9 sec
888 ms
Visit screenrec.com now to see the best up-to-date Screenrec content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about screenrec.com
From task assignment to bug reporting and internal training, ScreenRec is trusted by 350,000+ users to reduce the need for meetings, cut down on emails and communicate more effectively across location...
Visit screenrec.comWe analyzed Screenrec.com page load time and found that the first response time was 76 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
screenrec.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.3 s
3/100
10%
Value12.6 s
0/100
25%
Value13.7 s
2/100
10%
Value2,730 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value27.5 s
0/100
10%
76 ms
61 ms
215 ms
22 ms
34 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Screenrec.com, 12% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Play.streamingvideoprovider.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (907 ms) relates to the external source Member.screenrec.com.
Page size can be reduced by 686.2 kB (71%)
962.8 kB
276.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Screenrec.com main page is 962.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 477.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 279.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 279.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Screenrec images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 406.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Screenrec.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 406.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (19%)
31
25
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screenrec. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
screenrec.com
76 ms
main-without-blog-7b375b38f5.css
61 ms
dplayer.js
215 ms
init-screenrec-722122afd9.js
22 ms
css
34 ms
gtm.js
53 ms
Logo-circle.gif
9 ms
logo.svg
14 ms
browser.jpg
14 ms
blank.gif
22 ms
george.png
21 ms
deyan.png
72 ms
gerry.jpg
38 ms
conrad.png
46 ms
rainer.jpg
39 ms
js
184 ms
analytics.js
179 ms
sticky_player.js
157 ms
round-tick.svg
55 ms
blockquotes.svg
49 ms
flash_icon.png
281 ms
eina01-bold-webfont.woff
290 ms
Inter-Regular.woff
408 ms
Inter-SemiBold.woff
449 ms
svp-icons.svg
290 ms
eina01-regular-webfont.woff
405 ms
eina01-semibold-webfont.woff
268 ms
Inter-Light.woff
582 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
270 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
288 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
392 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
441 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
442 ms
collect
171 ms
sticky_player.css
171 ms
screen-recorder-no-watermark.svg
171 ms
video-screen-capture.svg
176 ms
screen-recorder-app.svg
174 ms
screen-capture-software.svg
171 ms
collect
176 ms
js
176 ms
index.php
907 ms
ga-audiences
75 ms
screenrec.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
screenrec.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
screenrec.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screenrec.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Screenrec.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
screenrec.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Screenrec. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: