12.9 sec in total
965 ms
10.6 sec
1.3 sec
Visit scripturegeek.org now to see the best up-to-date Scripturegeek content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about scripturegeek.org
See related links to what you are looking for.
Visit scripturegeek.orgWe analyzed Scripturegeek.org page load time and found that the first response time was 965 ms and then it took 11.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
scripturegeek.org performance score
965 ms
50 ms
99 ms
92 ms
189 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Scripturegeek.org, 14% (11 requests) were made to Img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net and 13% (10 requests) were made to Simcast.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (9.1 sec) relates to the external source Img2.smartsearch.me.
Page size can be reduced by 575.0 kB (48%)
1.2 MB
633.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Scripturegeek.org main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 434.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.5 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Scripturegeek images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 187.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 187.4 kB or 58% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 337.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Scripturegeek.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 337.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (64%)
47
17
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Scripturegeek. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
simcast.com
965 ms
jquery-3.4.1.min.js
50 ms
html.css
99 ms
all.min.css
92 ms
OneSignalSDK.js
189 ms
gpt.js
109 ms
enhance.js
178 ms
jquery.modal.min.js
181 ms
jquery.modal.min.css
379 ms
modal.css
104 ms
login.js
80 ms
img2.smartsearch.me
9115 ms
img4.smartsearch.me
2109 ms
simcastlogo_35y.png
93 ms
img4.smartsearch.me
2107 ms
img4.smartsearch.me
2107 ms
img4.smartsearch.me
2109 ms
img4.smartsearch.me
2108 ms
img4.smartsearch.me
2108 ms
img4.smartsearch.me
2109 ms
img4.smartsearch.me
2109 ms
img2.smartsearch.me
9112 ms
img2.smartsearch.me
9111 ms
img2.smartsearch.me
9111 ms
img2.smartsearch.me
9111 ms
img2.smartsearch.me
9108 ms
img2.smartsearch.me
9109 ms
img2.smartsearch.me
9109 ms
img2.smartsearch.me
9108 ms
img2.smartsearch.me
9108 ms
img2.smartsearch.me
9108 ms
img2.smartsearch.me
9108 ms
img2.smartsearch.me
9108 ms
img2.smartsearch.me
9107 ms
img2.smartsearch.me
9107 ms
pubads_impl_2020102201.js
229 ms
jmZlp9o9KQo
652 ms
integrator.js
307 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
411 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
387 ms
ads
283 ms
container.html
233 ms
ads
255 ms
js.php
143 ms
BB1at4je.img
185 ms
smart.js
195 ms
osd_listener.js
196 ms
osd.js
484 ms
AACl4vY.img
66 ms
BB1asVm6.img
105 ms
BBO6J5d.img
64 ms
AAADLcm.img
101 ms
BB1asRdR.img
97 ms
2364309221291099109
128 ms
abg_lite.js
421 ms
window_focus.js
428 ms
www-player.css
38 ms
www-embed-player.js
101 ms
base.js
183 ms
fetch-polyfill.js
81 ms
BB1at43m.img
79 ms
AA3lldo.img
55 ms
BBNvr53.img
55 ms
BB1asKLv.img
89 ms
BB1asQNx.img
65 ms
notfound.php
434 ms
ac
807 ms
ac
808 ms
ac
814 ms
ac
827 ms
id
619 ms
ad_status.js
534 ms
IrvWYL9cMQDdQTlUfy4EmSWPiDUBB4ig0nZVQdwez_Q.js
340 ms
embed.js
134 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
108 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
109 ms
activeview
105 ms
activeview
94 ms
scripturegeek.org SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Scripturegeek.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Scripturegeek.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
scripturegeek.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Scripturegeek. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: