Tools & Wizards About Us
sealking.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

sealking.com

Minnesota Professional Seal Coating Services | Driveway Repair MN | Professional Seal Coating

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

172 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

317 ms

sealking.com screenshot

About Website

Visit sealking.com now to see the best up-to-date Seal King content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sealking.com

Welcome To Seal King Professional Seal Coating Seal King was founded in 1991 by the current owner and CEO, Ben Nelson. Seal King started as a one man operation with minimal tools and equipment, and fo...

Visit sealking.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sealking.com page load time and found that the first response time was 172 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sealking.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value11.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.5 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.013

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.1 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sealking.com

172 ms

www.sealking.com

518 ms

showcase.css

102 ms

style.min.css

258 ms

rokbox.css

209 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Sealking.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (818 ms) belongs to the original domain Sealking.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (36%)

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sealking.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 74.6 kB

  • Original 92.2 kB
  • After minification 87.0 kB
  • After compression 17.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 70.6 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Seal King images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 576.0 kB

  • Original 779.5 kB
  • After minification 684.0 kB
  • After compression 203.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 576.0 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 291.5 kB

  • Original 383.7 kB
  • After minification 359.6 kB
  • After compression 92.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sealking.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 291.5 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (59%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

26

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Seal King. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sealking.com

sealking.com

172 ms

www.sealking.com

www.sealking.com

518 ms

showcase.css

showcase.css

102 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

258 ms

rokbox.css

rokbox.css

209 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

261 ms

thickbox.css

thickbox.css

159 ms

demo-styles.css

demo-styles.css

157 ms

grid-12-responsive.css

grid-12-responsive.css

211 ms

gantry-core.css

gantry-core.css

210 ms

wordpress-core.css

wordpress-core.css

262 ms

main-dark.css

main-dark.css

316 ms

utilities.css

utilities.css

264 ms

typography.css

typography.css

308 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

312 ms

template.css

template.css

314 ms

mediaqueries.css

mediaqueries.css

315 ms

fusionmenu.css

fusionmenu.css

361 ms

style.css

style.css

364 ms

mootools.js

mootools.js

522 ms

mootools-mobile.js

mootools-mobile.js

367 ms

rokmediaqueries.js

rokmediaqueries.js

367 ms

roksprocket.js

roksprocket.js

405 ms

moofx.js

moofx.js

415 ms

features.js

features.js

415 ms

showcase.js

showcase.js

417 ms

rokbox.js

rokbox.js

562 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

818 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

466 ms

rokmediaqueries.js

rokmediaqueries.js

468 ms

modules-height.js

modules-height.js

469 ms

fusion.js

fusion.js

518 ms

gantry-totop.js

gantry-totop.js

519 ms

rokajaxsearch.js

rokajaxsearch.js

566 ms

custom3.css

custom3.css

571 ms

frontend_style.css

frontend_style.css

529 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

530 ms

thickbox.js

thickbox.js

530 ms

frontend_script.js

frontend_script.js

479 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

471 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

93 ms

body-bg.jpg

body-bg.jpg

129 ms

SealKing-Logo.png

SealKing-Logo.png

91 ms

title-find-a-location.jpg

title-find-a-location.jpg

92 ms

zip-code-states.png

zip-code-states.png

93 ms

img5.jpg

img5.jpg

337 ms

img4.jpg

img4.jpg

179 ms

img3.jpg

img3.jpg

134 ms

img2.jpg

img2.jpg

650 ms

professional-asphalt-seal-coating-mn.jpg

professional-asphalt-seal-coating-mn.jpg

186 ms

Seal-King-Hot-Mix-Sealer-Applied.jpg

Seal-King-Hot-Mix-Sealer-Applied.jpg

235 ms

wcco1.png

wcco1.png

187 ms

Seal-King-33-Shield.png

Seal-King-33-Shield.png

234 ms

Asphalt-Sealcoating-Hot-Mix-Sealer-Web-Optimized.png

Asphalt-Sealcoating-Hot-Mix-Sealer-Web-Optimized.png

292 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

240 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

289 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

288 ms

einstein-search-engine-optimization-mn.png

einstein-search-engine-optimization-mn.png

293 ms

nav-bg-hover.jpg

nav-bg-hover.jpg

323 ms

nav-arrows.png

nav-arrows.png

324 ms

readon.png

readon.png

327 ms

sprocket-showcase.png

sprocket-showcase.png

329 ms

bevel-border.png

bevel-border.png

372 ms

sprocket-headlines.png

sprocket-headlines.png

377 ms

loadingAnimation.gif

loadingAnimation.gif

305 ms

Accessibility Review

sealking.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

sealking.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

sealking.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sealking.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sealking.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sealking.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Seal King. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: