Tools & Wizards About Us
searchandfilter.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 79

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

searchandfilter.com

Home - Search & Filter Pro

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

193 ms

Resources Loaded

767 ms

Page Rendered

250 ms

searchandfilter.com screenshot

About Website

Visit searchandfilter.com now to see the best up-to-date Search And Filter content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about searchandfilter.com

Search & Filter for WordPress allows you to build powerful search experiences for your users and customers - help them find the content they are looking for by creating filters for custom fields, taxo...

Visit searchandfilter.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Searchandfilter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 193 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

searchandfilter.com performance score

79

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

74/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.8 s

79/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

searchandfilter.com

193 ms

searchandfilter.com

144 ms

edd-blocks.css

27 ms

simple-docs-public.css

26 ms

styles.css

35 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Searchandfilter.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (221 ms) belongs to the original domain Searchandfilter.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 81.4 kB (20%)

Content Size

408.9 kB

After Optimization

327.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Searchandfilter.com main page is 408.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 166.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 70.3 kB

  • Original 86.5 kB
  • After minification 83.0 kB
  • After compression 16.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 46.5 kB
  • After minification 46.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Search And Filter images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 166.3 kB
  • After minification 165.9 kB
  • After compression 164.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 9.7 kB

  • Original 109.6 kB
  • After minification 109.3 kB
  • After compression 99.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Searchandfilter.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (81%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Search And Filter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

searchandfilter.com

searchandfilter.com

193 ms

searchandfilter.com

searchandfilter.com

144 ms

edd-blocks.css

edd-blocks.css

27 ms

simple-docs-public.css

simple-docs-public.css

26 ms

styles.css

styles.css

35 ms

style.css

style.css

28 ms

grid-system.css

grid-system.css

64 ms

element-icon-with-text.css

element-icon-with-text.css

29 ms

cf7.css

cf7.css

37 ms

menu-dynamic.css

menu-dynamic.css

127 ms

style.css

style.css

51 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

60 ms

style.css

style.css

221 ms

ascend.css

ascend.css

58 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

67 ms

salient-dynamic-styles-multi-id-1.css

salient-dynamic-styles-multi-id-1.css

80 ms

lite-yt-embed.css

lite-yt-embed.css

79 ms

css

css

35 ms

gdpr-main-nf.css

gdpr-main-nf.css

76 ms

script.js

script.js

21 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

85 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

91 ms

simple-docs-public.js

simple-docs-public.js

94 ms

lite-yt-embed.js

lite-yt-embed.js

86 ms

style-non-critical.css

style-non-critical.css

100 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

105 ms

core.css

core.css

105 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

110 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

116 ms

priority.js

priority.js

122 ms

transit.min.js

transit.min.js

116 ms

waypoints.js

waypoints.js

129 ms

imagesLoaded.min.js

imagesLoaded.min.js

140 ms

hoverintent.min.js

hoverintent.min.js

129 ms

anime.min.js

anime.min.js

138 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

137 ms

init.js

init.js

163 ms

touchswipe.min.js

touchswipe.min.js

144 ms

main.js

main.js

153 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

149 ms

horizontal-small.svg

horizontal-small.svg

75 ms

horizontal-white-small.svg

horizontal-white-small.svg

74 ms

banner.png

banner.png

155 ms

speedometer.png

speedometer.png

77 ms

flash.png

flash.png

78 ms

video-player.png

video-player.png

77 ms

chat-2.png

chat-2.png

141 ms

online-shop.png

online-shop.png

78 ms

plug.png

plug.png

77 ms

filter.png

filter.png

80 ms

internet.png

internet.png

77 ms

browser-3.png

browser-3.png

101 ms

browser-2.png

browser-2.png

124 ms

sf-logos.png

sf-logos.png

184 ms

gdpr-logo.png

gdpr-logo.png

125 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

46 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

47 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

63 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

63 ms

Accessibility Review

searchandfilter.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

searchandfilter.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

searchandfilter.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Searchandfilter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Searchandfilter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

searchandfilter.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Search And Filter. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: