3.3 sec in total
89 ms
2.8 sec
387 ms
Click here to check amazing Searchengineoptimizationjournal content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about searchengineoptimizationjournal.com
Boston Digital Marketing Company, Brick Marketing shares helpful information about SEO, Content Marketing, Social Media Marketing, PPC and more.
Visit searchengineoptimizationjournal.comWe analyzed Searchengineoptimizationjournal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 89 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
searchengineoptimizationjournal.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value3.5 s
64/100
25%
Value3.1 s
93/100
10%
Value180 ms
91/100
30%
Value0.016
100/100
15%
Value4.7 s
80/100
10%
89 ms
425 ms
194 ms
202 ms
345 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Searchengineoptimizationjournal.com, 14% (8 requests) were made to Frog.wix.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Static.parastorage.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.2 MB (76%)
2.9 MB
713.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Searchengineoptimizationjournal.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Searchengineoptimizationjournal needs image optimization as it can save up to 8.9 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.1 MB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Searchengineoptimizationjournal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (75%)
55
14
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Searchengineoptimizationjournal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.nickstamoulis.com
89 ms
bt
425 ms
require.min.js
194 ms
main-r.min.js
202 ms
viewer.css
345 ms
UpgradeBrowser.js
397 ms
dynamicmodel
180 ms
dbf44a_3079ad06567aac9d8331a7047b6eb867_64.json.z
372 ms
dbf44a_a3762f6bd17ca8d99d4309e43eb8a94d_64.json.z
222 ms
ugc-viewer
120 ms
bt
272 ms
skins.min.js
277 ms
components.min.js
245 ms
utils.min.js
251 ms
core.min.js
130 ms
react-with-addons.min.js
241 ms
lodash.min.js
246 ms
TweenMax.min.js
254 ms
layout.min.js
260 ms
tpa.min.js
256 ms
fonts.min.js
259 ms
animations.min.js
255 ms
swfobject.min.js
254 ms
mousetrap.min.js
270 ms
tweenEngine.min.js
260 ms
DrawSVGPlugin.min.js
260 ms
react-dom.min.js
253 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
258 ms
widgets.min.js
255 ms
experiment.js
257 ms
render.min.js
259 ms
wixappsCore.min.js
269 ms
wixappsClassics.min.js
1012 ms
wixappsBuilder.min.js
264 ms
zepto.min.js
219 ms
color.min.js
223 ms
react-dom-server.min.js
685 ms
bt
110 ms
latin.css
156 ms
dc.js
114 ms
bt
616 ms
dbf44a_c17de1bdc12d4b4b815023343c18305e.jpg
404 ms
mobileIEFix.css
291 ms
css
288 ms
twitter.html
297 ms
dbf44a_18fbd0a1ed9f0dc784fb89f73f711908.html
304 ms
twitter.html
299 ms
dbf44a_4c31ad6f2c5c48c4bc507fcd57d818a3.gif
264 ms
dbf44a_87169b697cf44829a88ef361cbcb94f0.jpg
257 ms
bt
81 ms
bt
80 ms
bt
106 ms
widgets.js
142 ms
__utm.gif
24 ms
follow_button.html
163 ms
follow_button.html
206 ms
searchengineoptimizationjournal.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
searchengineoptimizationjournal.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
searchengineoptimizationjournal.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Searchengineoptimizationjournal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Searchengineoptimizationjournal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
searchengineoptimizationjournal.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Searchengineoptimizationjournal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: