2.9 sec in total
79 ms
1 sec
1.8 sec
Welcome to searchingfor.me homepage info - get ready to check Searching For best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about searchingfor.me
Join me in my journey across the ocean of life. Lots of cycling, electronics and rants spilled around here!
Visit searchingfor.meWe analyzed Searchingfor.me page load time and found that the first response time was 79 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
searchingfor.me performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value9.6 s
0/100
25%
Value6.8 s
35/100
10%
Value2,810 ms
3/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value21.5 s
1/100
10%
79 ms
7 ms
4 ms
27 ms
86 ms
Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Searchingfor.me, 57% (57 requests) were made to Thesearchingforme.wordpress.com and 13% (13 requests) were made to S0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (681 ms) relates to the external source Thesearchingforme.wordpress.com.
Page size can be reduced by 226.4 kB (16%)
1.5 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Searchingfor.me main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 983.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 223.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 223.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Searching For images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 969 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 284 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Searchingfor.me has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (23%)
86
66
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Searching For. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
searchingfor.me
79 ms
www.thesearchingforme.wordpress.com
7 ms
thesearchingforme.wordpress.com
4 ms
thesearchingforme.wordpress.com
27 ms
86 ms
style.css
91 ms
99 ms
101 ms
109 ms
css
147 ms
110 ms
global.css
114 ms
114 ms
hovercards.min.js
108 ms
wpgroho.js
110 ms
108 ms
tiled-gallery.css
110 ms
110 ms
w.js
111 ms
bilmur.min.js
403 ms
global-print.css
2 ms
conf
254 ms
ga.js
49 ms
3523023f1b52535bc3593284b6c4e88e4c67cb3f2df654ba5c826c4f08a510ee
202 ms
5e7ef957ac7b137c02e2fbf270fb260b6fc524d42ee1918f0a8b2eccf5e55087
179 ms
wpcom-gray-white.png
18 ms
wpcom-mark.svg
11 ms
g.gif
175 ms
cropped-blog-6.jpg
174 ms
img_6609.jpg
152 ms
img_6608.jpg
370 ms
img_6611.jpg
225 ms
img_6617.jpg
212 ms
img_6612-2.jpg
298 ms
img_6616.jpg
681 ms
img_6622.jpeg
321 ms
img_6620.jpeg
323 ms
img_6623.jpeg
323 ms
img_6626.jpeg
353 ms
whatsapp-image-2022-04-22-at-6.59.02-am-4.jpeg
325 ms
img_6627.jpeg
352 ms
img_0521.jpg
359 ms
img_0530.jpg
359 ms
img_6629.jpeg
364 ms
img_6630-1.jpeg
365 ms
bf773533-0085-4262-b6d4-10f16b1b39cd-edited-1.jpeg
367 ms
whatsapp-image-2022-04-23-at-5.59.34-am-edited.jpeg
366 ms
img_9552.jpeg
375 ms
img_9569-1.jpeg
374 ms
dsc_0078.jpg
375 ms
img_9563.jpeg
375 ms
img_9577.jpeg
376 ms
dsc_0177.jpg
381 ms
img_9580-1.jpeg
378 ms
img_9586.jpeg
378 ms
5_m-fpix-3-01053255-digital_highres-5019_022690-12298707.jpg
381 ms
9_m-fpix-3-01053255-digital_highres-5019_022694-12298711.jpg
381 ms
30_m-fpix-3-01053255-digital_highres-5019_056407-12298732.jpg
387 ms
swimcourse.jpg
385 ms
img_6670-2.jpg
385 ms
dsc_0394-1.jpg
386 ms
dsc_0416.jpg
425 ms
13_m-fpix-3-01053255-digital_highres-5019_033834-12298715.jpg
388 ms
g.gif
172 ms
g.gif
209 ms
__utm.gif
79 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf
180 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf
180 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA.ttf
181 ms
Genericons.svg
32 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
2 ms
Aleo-Bold.woff
74 ms
Aleo-Regular-webfont.woff
31 ms
Aleo-Light-webfont.woff
115 ms
Aleo-Italic-webfont.woff
115 ms
Aleo-LightItalic-webfont.woff
116 ms
Aleo-BoldItalic.woff
148 ms
2_m-fpix-3-01053255-digital_highres-5019_010034-12298704.jpg
242 ms
349 ms
36_m-fpix-3-01053255-digital_highres-5019_072376-12298738.jpg
218 ms
42_m-fpix-3-01053255-digital_highres-5019_112698-12298744.jpg
177 ms
135 ms
image-3.png
169 ms
ata.js
106 ms
image.png
147 ms
46_m-fpix-3-01053255-digital_highres-5019_120698-12298748.jpg
74 ms
38_m-fpix-3-01053255-digital_highres-5019_103998-12298740.jpg
72 ms
54_m-fpix-3-01053255-digital_highres-5019_133313-12298756.jpg
73 ms
img_6631.jpeg
76 ms
57_m-fpix-3-01053255-digital_highres-5019_141949-12298759-3.jpg
49 ms
48_m-fpix-3-01053255-digital_highres-5019_126043-12298750.jpg
48 ms
img_9610.jpeg
45 ms
img_9613.jpeg
43 ms
image-4.png
51 ms
59_m-fpix-3-01053255-digital_highres-5019_148820-12298761.jpg
44 ms
60_m-fpix-3-01053255-digital_highres-5019_148821-12298762-2.jpg
44 ms
61_m-fpix-3-01053255-digital_highres-5019_148822-12298763.jpg
44 ms
66_m-fpix-3-01053255-digital_highres-5019_158948-12298768.jpg
42 ms
actionbar.css
4 ms
actionbar.js
13 ms
searchingfor.me accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
searchingfor.me best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
searchingfor.me SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Searchingfor.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Searchingfor.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
searchingfor.me
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Searching For. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: