Tools & Wizards About Us
sectionhiker.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

sectionhiker.com

SectionHiker - SectionHiker.com

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

279 ms

Resources Loaded

974 ms

Page Rendered

289 ms

sectionhiker.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to sectionhiker.com homepage info - get ready to check Section Hiker best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about sectionhiker.com

SectionHiker is the most trusted source of backpacking gear guides, hiking gear reviews, FAQs, and hiking trip reports.

Visit sectionhiker.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sectionhiker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 279 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sectionhiker.com performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

87/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

76/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

50/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,350 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.9 s

65/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sectionhiker.com

279 ms

86 ms

105 ms

css

23 ms

brand

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Sectionhiker.com, 29% (17 requests) were made to Assets.sectionhiker.com and 12% (7 requests) were made to Px.owneriq.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (279 ms) belongs to the original domain Sectionhiker.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 304.2 kB (53%)

Content Size

572.2 kB

After Optimization

268.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sectionhiker.com main page is 572.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 341.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 47.8 kB

  • Original 63.1 kB
  • After minification 63.1 kB
  • After compression 15.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.8 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 20.7 kB

  • Original 160.2 kB
  • After minification 139.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Section Hiker needs image optimization as it can save up to 20.7 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 230.3 kB

  • Original 341.6 kB
  • After minification 338.6 kB
  • After compression 111.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 230.3 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 5.5 kB

  • Original 7.3 kB
  • After minification 7.2 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sectionhiker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.5 kB or 75% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (56%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Section Hiker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sectionhiker.com

sectionhiker.com

279 ms

86 ms

105 ms

css

css

23 ms

brand

brand

24 ms

brand

brand

122 ms

ultrarevie-20_d8517253-ab6e-4f9b-a1d7-d15f4e0a9904.js

ultrarevie-20_d8517253-ab6e-4f9b-a1d7-d15f4e0a9904.js

28 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

50 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

46 ms

devicepx-jetpack.js

devicepx-jetpack.js

127 ms

wp-gallery-custom-links.js

wp-gallery-custom-links.js

52 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

47 ms

ale.php

ale.php

94 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

68 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

122 ms

P1010983-4.jpg

P1010983-4.jpg

49 ms

newlogo-2.jpg

newlogo-2.jpg

60 ms

Beardoh-and-Sweetpea-on-Mt-Katahdin-in-2011-112x67.jpg

Beardoh-and-Sweetpea-on-Mt-Katahdin-in-2011-112x67.jpg

61 ms

Couples-Backpacking-112x79.jpg

Couples-Backpacking-112x79.jpg

64 ms

The-MSR-Flylite-is-a-Trekking-Pole-Tent-with-a-boxy-shape-112x75.jpg

The-MSR-Flylite-is-a-Trekking-Pole-Tent-with-a-boxy-shape-112x75.jpg

59 ms

Landslide-scarred-peak-of-Mt-Passaconaway-112x84.jpg

Landslide-scarred-peak-of-Mt-Passaconaway-112x84.jpg

64 ms

rss.png

rss.png

60 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

61 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

62 ms

pinterest.png

pinterest.png

61 ms

google-plus.png

google-plus.png

61 ms

quant.js

quant.js

60 ms

js

js

223 ms

SECHIK.js

SECHIK.js

56 ms

google_custom_search_watermark.gif

google_custom_search_watermark.gif

66 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

25 ms

sDRi4fY9bOiJUbgq53yZCXYhjbSpvc47ee6xR_80Hnw.woff

sDRi4fY9bOiJUbgq53yZCXYhjbSpvc47ee6xR_80Hnw.woff

65 ms

collect

collect

21 ms

pixel;r=1209420104;a=p-12EAknZ5oT32c;fpan=1;fpa=P0-68538010-1456769246423;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1456769246422;tzo=-180;ref=;url=http%3A%2F%2Fsectionhiker.com%2F;ogl=type.website%2Csite_name.Section%20Hikers%20Backpacking%20Blog%2Ctitle.Section%20Hikers%20Backpacking%20Blog%2Curl.http%3A%2F%2Fsectionhiker%252Ecom%2F%2Cdescription.Hands%20on%20backpacking%20gear%20reviews%20and%20hiking%20skills%20how-tos%20for%20expert%20and%20begin%2Clocale.en_US%2Cimage.http%3A%2F%2Fassets%252Esectionhiker%252Ecom%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fthumbskeep%2F2011%2F07%2Fnewlogo-2%252Ej%2Cimage%3Atype.image%2Fjpeg%2Ctitle.Section%20Hikers%20Backpacking%20Blog%2Curl.http%3A%2F%2Fsectionhiker%252Ecom%2F%2Cimage.http%3A%2F%2Fsectionhiker%252Ecom%2Fwp-content%2Fplugins%2Fall-in-one-seo-pack%2Fimages%2Fdefault-us%2Csite_name.Section%20Hikers%20Backpacking%20Blog%2Cdescription.Beardoh%20and%20SweetPea%20on%20the%20John%20Muir%20Trail%20How%20long%20have%20you%20been%20a%20couple%3F%20We%20

pixel;r=1209420104;a=p-12EAknZ5oT32c;fpan=1;fpa=P0-68538010-1456769246423;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1456769246422;tzo=-180;ref=;url=http%3A%2F%2Fsectionhiker.com%2F;ogl=type.website%2Csite_name.Section%20Hikers%20Backpacking%20Blog%2Ctitle.Section%20Hikers%20Backpacking%20Blog%2Curl.http%3A%2F%2Fsectionhiker%252Ecom%2F%2Cdescription.Hands%20on%20backpacking%20gear%20reviews%20and%20hiking%20skills%20how-tos%20for%20expert%20and%20begin%2Clocale.en_US%2Cimage.http%3A%2F%2Fassets%252Esectionhiker%252Ecom%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fthumbskeep%2F2011%2F07%2Fnewlogo-2%252Ej%2Cimage%3Atype.image%2Fjpeg%2Ctitle.Section%20Hikers%20Backpacking%20Blog%2Curl.http%3A%2F%2Fsectionhiker%252Ecom%2F%2Cimage.http%3A%2F%2Fsectionhiker%252Ecom%2Fwp-content%2Fplugins%2Fall-in-one-seo-pack%2Fimages%2Fdefault-us%2Csite_name.Section%20Hikers%20Backpacking%20Blog%2Cdescription.Beardoh%20and%20SweetPea%20on%20the%20John%20Muir%20Trail%20How%20long%20have%20you%20been%20a%20couple%3F%20We%20

12 ms

eexelate.js

eexelate.js

153 ms

153 ms

aps-adserving.min.js

aps-adserving.min.js

9 ms

collect

collect

160 ms

ps-spr-1-mobile.png

ps-spr-1-mobile.png

8 ms

aps-base.min.css

aps-base.min.css

113 ms

ps-spr-2-mobile.png

ps-spr-2-mobile.png

114 ms

1806180022.json

1806180022.json

23 ms

ep

ep

6 ms

ep

ep

9 ms

pixel

pixel

90 ms

83 ms

pixel

pixel

19 ms

in.php

in.php

133 ms

cm

cm

8 ms

net.php

net.php

9 ms

pixel

pixel

37 ms

generic

generic

34 ms

ermcm

ermcm

12 ms

generic

generic

8 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

7 ms

52154.gif

52154.gif

7 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

5 ms

xrefid.xgi

xrefid.xgi

5 ms

Accessibility Review

sectionhiker.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

sectionhiker.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sectionhiker.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sectionhiker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sectionhiker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sectionhiker.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Section Hiker. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: