3.1 sec in total
281 ms
2.2 sec
644 ms
Click here to check amazing Secure Coding content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about securecoding.com
SecureCoding.com is your single source for everything you need to know about code security guidelines and best practices in order to secure your code.
Visit securecoding.comWe analyzed Securecoding.com page load time and found that the first response time was 281 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
securecoding.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
65/100
10%
Value4.1 s
46/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value80 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.016
100/100
15%
Value3.9 s
88/100
10%
281 ms
476 ms
184 ms
353 ms
379 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Securecoding.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Fast.wistia.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (811 ms) belongs to the original domain Securecoding.com.
Page size can be reduced by 78.5 kB (9%)
899.2 kB
820.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Securecoding.com main page is 899.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 815.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 65.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Secure Coding images are well optimized though.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (19%)
26
21
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Secure Coding. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
securecoding.com
281 ms
www.securecoding.com
476 ms
style.min.css
184 ms
styles.css
353 ms
wp-image-borders.css
379 ms
theme.css
446 ms
style.css
352 ms
addtoany.min.css
393 ms
jquery.min.js
393 ms
theme.js
631 ms
swatch
74 ms
Secure-Coding_new-logo_SecureCoding_logo_Horizontal.svg
170 ms
icon-search.056b20ea94.svg
192 ms
hero.png
265 ms
Ruby-Malware-and-Prevention-Methodology.png
235 ms
Five-Ruby-Malware-Threats-to-Be-Aware-of.png
200 ms
ow-to-Automate-Server-Hardening.png
234 ms
What-is-the-Diffie-Hellman-Key-Exchange-and-How-Does-it-Work.png
232 ms
Server-Attack-Prevention.png
408 ms
SecureCoding_logo_Horizontal_White-1.png
378 ms
desktop.png
426 ms
mobile.png
412 ms
49363af8f9f9db1f318e7f316eafce54-e1708072607810.jpg
377 ms
Threat-Modeling-vNext.jpg
435 ms
getting-API-security-right-e1708072663318.png
541 ms
Webinar.jpg
562 ms
1170x400-e1708072480694.png
650 ms
Featured-image-3.png
615 ms
roboto-v20-latin-400.1c76a4cb77.woff
672 ms
roboto-v20-latin-500.0f633ae8f8.woff
661 ms
roboto-v20-latin-300.6fa52cc7ec.woff
811 ms
roboto-v20-latin-700.ee89196449.woff
696 ms
securecoding.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
securecoding.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
securecoding.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Securecoding.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Securecoding.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
securecoding.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Secure Coding. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: