Tools & Wizards About Us
securereading.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

securereading.com

SecureReading | The Cyber security Destination| Latest Technology News

Page Load Speed

15 sec in total

First Response

521 ms

Resources Loaded

14 sec

Page Rendered

435 ms

securereading.com screenshot

About Website

Visit securereading.com now to see the best up-to-date Secure Reading content for United Arab Emirates and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about securereading.com

SecureReading - One stop destination for latest cyber security news, threats, security trends and solutions to all cyber security queries. Your Security is Our Priority!

Visit securereading.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Securereading.com page load time and found that the first response time was 521 ms and then it took 14.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

securereading.com performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.7 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.5 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.383

27/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.9 s

43/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

securereading.com

521 ms

securereading.com

1291 ms

gtm.js

60 ms

webfontloader.min.js

263 ms

20aa7f8063dd66c60ce8a5b0da6d14eb.css

797 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Securereading.com, 13% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (9.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Securereading.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 188.4 kB (9%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Securereading.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 66.4 kB

  • Original 74.9 kB
  • After minification 58.4 kB
  • After compression 8.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.5 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.4 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 117.9 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Secure Reading images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 4.1 kB

  • Original 77.6 kB
  • After minification 77.6 kB
  • After compression 73.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 69.4 kB
  • After minification 69.4 kB
  • After compression 69.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Securereading.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (66%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Secure Reading. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

securereading.com

securereading.com

521 ms

securereading.com

securereading.com

1291 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

60 ms

webfontloader.min.js

webfontloader.min.js

263 ms

20aa7f8063dd66c60ce8a5b0da6d14eb.css

20aa7f8063dd66c60ce8a5b0da6d14eb.css

797 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

929 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

815 ms

js

js

103 ms

index.js

index.js

900 ms

index.js

index.js

1046 ms

cv.js

cv.js

1033 ms

edd-ajax.js

edd-ajax.js

1153 ms

dlm-xhr.min.js

dlm-xhr.min.js

1160 ms

email-before-download-public.js

email-before-download-public.js

1269 ms

jquery.fitvids.min.js

jquery.fitvids.min.js

1294 ms

ResizeSensor.min.js

ResizeSensor.min.js

1400 ms

theia-sticky-sidebar.min.js

theia-sticky-sidebar.min.js

1393 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

1532 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

1549 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1627 ms

html5shiv.js

html5shiv.js

1656 ms

wpmssab.min.js

wpmssab.min.js

1766 ms

SmoothScroll.min.js

SmoothScroll.min.js

1812 ms

wpmss.min.js

wpmss.min.js

1860 ms

jquery-scrollto.js

jquery-scrollto.js

1918 ms

post-grid-shortcode-scripts.js

post-grid-shortcode-scripts.js

2014 ms

css

css

42 ms

font

font

18 ms

font

font

50 ms

font

font

25 ms

font

font

24 ms

font

font

26 ms

font

font

27 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

1842 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

1332 ms

financial-losses-cyber-hacking-heimdal-security.png

financial-losses-cyber-hacking-heimdal-security.png

31 ms

securereading-logo-e1596684287225.png

securereading-logo-e1596684287225.png

264 ms

Untitled-design-18.png

Untitled-design-18.png

1586 ms

Untitled-design-17.png

Untitled-design-17.png

9368 ms

Alpaca-Forms-and-Picreel-BREACH.jpg.webp

Alpaca-Forms-and-Picreel-BREACH.jpg.webp

766 ms

Untitled-design-16.png

Untitled-design-16.png

3504 ms

Alpaca-Forms-and-Picreel-BREACH-680x340.jpg.webp

Alpaca-Forms-and-Picreel-BREACH-680x340.jpg.webp

613 ms

Untitled-design-15.png

Untitled-design-15.png

530 ms

cybersecurity-training-registration-1.png

cybersecurity-training-registration-1.png

780 ms

cybersecurity-job-offer.png

cybersecurity-job-offer.png

880 ms

Accessibility Review

securereading.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

securereading.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

securereading.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Securereading.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Securereading.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

securereading.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Secure Reading. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: