Tools & Wizards About Us
security-display.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

security-display.com

Anti theft pull box retractable pull box plastic coil lanyard

Page Load Speed

6.2 sec in total

First Response

629 ms

Resources Loaded

5.4 sec

Page Rendered

206 ms

security-display.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Security Display content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about security-display.com

YOMO SECURITY DISPLAY Co., Ltd. is a china leading manufacture of Anti-Theft Pull Box,Retractable Security Tether,Cable Retractor, Anti-theft Recoiler,plastic coil lanyard,coil tool lanyard,smartphone

Visit security-display.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Security-display.com page load time and found that the first response time was 629 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

security-display.com performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.3 s

29/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.8 s

55/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.security-display.com

629 ms

www.security-display.com

876 ms

jquery-1.10.1.min.js

138 ms

common.js

171 ms

thickbox.js

195 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 22% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Security-display.com, 37% (20 requests) were made to Res.diytrade.com and 35% (19 requests) were made to Img.diytrade.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) relates to the external source Img.diytrade.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 258.4 kB (35%)

Content Size

736.8 kB

After Optimization

478.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Security-display.com main page is 736.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 692.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 19.2 kB

  • Original 24.5 kB
  • After minification 23.7 kB
  • After compression 5.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 234.4 kB

  • Original 692.3 kB
  • After minification 457.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Security Display needs image optimization as it can save up to 234.4 kB or 34% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 4.7 kB

  • Original 20.1 kB
  • After minification 20.1 kB
  • After compression 15.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Security-display.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.7 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (28%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

36

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Security Display. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.security-display.com

www.security-display.com

629 ms

www.security-display.com

www.security-display.com

876 ms

jquery-1.10.1.min.js

jquery-1.10.1.min.js

138 ms

common.js

common.js

171 ms

thickbox.js

thickbox.js

195 ms

thickbox.css

thickbox.css

199 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

204 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

206 ms

diy-page-editor.css

diy-page-editor.css

210 ms

common_page_css.css

common_page_css.css

208 ms

custom_page_css.css

custom_page_css.css

434 ms

jcarousellite_1.0.1.js

jcarousellite_1.0.1.js

839 ms

browser_update.js

browser_update.js

631 ms

sdp.js

sdp.js

639 ms

sdp.js

sdp.js

644 ms

chatfloat.css

chatfloat.css

216 ms

chatfloat.js

chatfloat.js

217 ms

js

js

48 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

98 ms

2aea.png

2aea.png

415 ms

h.png

h.png

688 ms

c7b7.jpg

c7b7.jpg

1533 ms

8837.jpg

8837.jpg

921 ms

ee93.jpg

ee93.jpg

874 ms

acba.jpg

acba.jpg

940 ms

e1f5.jpg

e1f5.jpg

820 ms

a7.jpg

a7.jpg

1031 ms

6a56.jpg

6a56.jpg

1262 ms

9eaa.jpg

9eaa.jpg

1263 ms

28dd.jpg

28dd.jpg

1285 ms

a6e7.jpg

a6e7.jpg

1348 ms

2ca9.jpg

2ca9.jpg

1740 ms

e035.jpg

e035.jpg

1814 ms

f91d.jpg

f91d.jpg

1622 ms

1259.jpg

1259.jpg

1640 ms

2c20.jpg

2c20.jpg

1699 ms

5d96.jpg

5d96.jpg

2046 ms

c020.jpg

c020.jpg

2079 ms

502.png

502.png

2370 ms

image.png

image.png

38 ms

border.png

border.png

31 ms

cloud.png

cloud.png

85 ms

plane.png

plane.png

32 ms

narrow_off.gif

narrow_off.gif

31 ms

dialog-warning.gif

dialog-warning.gif

213 ms

zoom.gif

zoom.gif

30 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

40 ms

shop_cart_off-3.gif

shop_cart_off-3.gif

210 ms

arimo-regular-webfont.woff

arimo-regular-webfont.woff

38 ms

LANENAR_-webfont.woff

LANENAR_-webfont.woff

36 ms

520 ms

loadingAnimation.gif

loadingAnimation.gif

211 ms

chat-whatsapp_80.png

chat-whatsapp_80.png

210 ms

chat-wechat_80.png

chat-wechat_80.png

209 ms

Accessibility Review

security-display.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

security-display.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

security-display.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Security-display.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Security-display.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

security-display.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Security Display. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: