11.4 sec in total
3.8 sec
7.4 sec
168 ms
Visit securitymailbox.com now to see the best up-to-date Securitymailbox content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about securitymailbox.com
Since 2002, Security Mailbox has 2200+ styles to choose from, all in stock, shipped via Los Angeles CA, or Redmond WA, usually in 24 hours. We wont be beat!
Visit securitymailbox.comWe analyzed Securitymailbox.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.8 sec and then it took 7.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
securitymailbox.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
45/100
10%
Value3.6 s
61/100
25%
Value10.9 s
6/100
10%
Value3,070 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.02
100/100
15%
Value15.3 s
7/100
10%
3792 ms
1182 ms
154 ms
309 ms
57 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Securitymailbox.com, 18% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Verify.authorize.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Securitymailbox.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (75%)
1.6 MB
403.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Securitymailbox.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 812.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.3 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Securitymailbox images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 463.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 463.2 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 677.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Securitymailbox.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 677.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (71%)
52
15
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Securitymailbox. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
securitymailbox.com
3792 ms
www.securitymailbox.com
1182 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
154 ms
1456110583index.css
309 ms
jquery-ui.css
57 ms
1456007171index.css
229 ms
1456110583index.css
402 ms
1457227044index.js
527 ms
1456110584index.js
231 ms
1456036739index.js
230 ms
1456036738index.js
304 ms
1456036738index.js
309 ms
seal.js
44 ms
thickbox.js
308 ms
frontend-builder-global-functions.js
381 ms
core.min.js
382 ms
datepicker.min.js
458 ms
wcj-datepicker.js
385 ms
wcj-weekpicker.js
458 ms
jquery.timepicker.min.js
460 ms
wcj-timepicker.js
461 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
476 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
581 ms
woocommerce.min.js
580 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
581 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
581 ms
jquery.mobile.custom.min.js
582 ms
custom.js
601 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
613 ms
waypoints.min.js
616 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
616 ms
frontend-builder-scripts.js
913 ms
jscripts-ftr-min.js
630 ms
wp-embed.min.js
695 ms
analytics.js
60 ms
-gU4qoGcjK0
104 ms
phone-as-logo3001.jpg
150 ms
lazy_placeholder.gif
166 ms
secure90x72.gif
11 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
70 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
90 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
117 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
115 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
116 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBl02b4v3fUxqf9CZJ1qUoIA.ttf
113 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxvqEJM-AK1nFUafhVdytxUY.ttf
130 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxmYImPRL1w80NlYTQ8LOqf4.ttf
130 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxiBnJMIPt0VoltfALX9gDFQ.ttf
130 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxk7Gbs5Oj9RrfpUUQRHsz5w.ttf
141 ms
ETmodules_v2_4.ttf
196 ms
search-commander-22140830.js
97 ms
collect
15 ms
collect
69 ms
www-embed-player-vflRGs1ko.css
75 ms
www-embed-player.js
100 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
23 ms
ad_status.js
60 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
16 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
16 ms
1456007171index.css
91 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
79 ms
search-commander-22140830.png
100 ms
-gU4qoGcjK0
91 ms
locking-mail-house.gif
92 ms
square-logo-2015b-e1420490464447.jpg
152 ms
rapidssl_ssl_certificate.gif
92 ms
usps-regs-50.jpg
93 ms
securitymailbox.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
securitymailbox.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
securitymailbox.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Securitymailbox.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Securitymailbox.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
securitymailbox.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Securitymailbox. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: