Tools & Wizards About Us
securitypolicytool.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

securitypolicytool.com

Security Policy Tool – A Tool for Editing, Modeling, Testing, and Verifying Security Policies to Prevent Access Control Leakage

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

199 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

328 ms

securitypolicytool.com screenshot

About Website

Visit securitypolicytool.com now to see the best up-to-date Security Policy Tool content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about securitypolicytool.com

Security Policy Tool – A Tool for Editing, Modeling, Testing, and Verifying Security Policies to Prevent Access Control Leakage

Visit securitypolicytool.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Securitypolicytool.com page load time and found that the first response time was 199 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

securitypolicytool.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.7 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,070 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.034

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.0 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

securitypolicytool.com

199 ms

securitypolicytool.com

401 ms

bootstrap.min.css

13 ms

style.css

30 ms

header-default.css

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Securitypolicytool.com, 9% (7 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Jnn-pa.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (637 ms) relates to the external source Youtube.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 543.8 kB (43%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

731.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Securitypolicytool.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 956.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 37.6 kB

  • Original 45.9 kB
  • After minification 35.6 kB
  • After compression 8.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.3 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.6 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 14.3 kB

  • Original 43.5 kB
  • After minification 29.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Security Policy Tool needs image optimization as it can save up to 14.3 kB or 33% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 425.4 kB

  • Original 956.5 kB
  • After minification 956.0 kB
  • After compression 531.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 425.4 kB or 44% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 66.5 kB

  • Original 229.6 kB
  • After minification 227.6 kB
  • After compression 163.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Securitypolicytool.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 66.5 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (76%)

Requests Now

75

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Security Policy Tool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

securitypolicytool.com

securitypolicytool.com

199 ms

securitypolicytool.com

securitypolicytool.com

401 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

13 ms

style.css

style.css

30 ms

header-default.css

header-default.css

25 ms

footer-v1.css

footer-v1.css

24 ms

animate.css

animate.css

39 ms

line-icons.css

line-icons.css

22 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

26 ms

parallax-slider.css

parallax-slider.css

32 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

34 ms

custom.css

custom.css

34 ms

jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.css

jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.css

40 ms

styles.css

styles.css

43 ms

page_one.css

page_one.css

37 ms

layerslider.css

layerslider.css

38 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

47 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

48 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

48 ms

jquery.validate.unobtrusive.min.js

jquery.validate.unobtrusive.min.js

48 ms

jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.js

jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.js

52 ms

public.common.js

public.common.js

52 ms

public.ajaxcart.js

public.ajaxcart.js

55 ms

layerslider.transitions.js

layerslider.transitions.js

52 ms

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

55 ms

greensock.js

greensock.js

59 ms

css

css

47 ms

cubeportfolio.min.css

cubeportfolio.min.css

61 ms

custom-cubeportfolio.css

custom-cubeportfolio.css

61 ms

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css

59 ms

sky-forms.css

sky-forms.css

64 ms

custom-sky-forms.css

custom-sky-forms.css

62 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

62 ms

in.js

in.js

30 ms

jquery.counterup.min.js

jquery.counterup.min.js

64 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

70 ms

parallax-slider.js

parallax-slider.js

70 ms

fancy-box.js

fancy-box.js

69 ms

jquery.cslider.js

jquery.cslider.js

73 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

71 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

60 ms

back-to-top.js

back-to-top.js

68 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

64 ms

smoothScroll.js

smoothScroll.js

62 ms

jquery.cubeportfolio.min.js

jquery.cubeportfolio.min.js

59 ms

ie8.css

ie8.css

56 ms

blocks.css

blocks.css

61 ms

plugins.css

plugins.css

64 ms

app.css

app.css

67 ms

app.js

app.js

62 ms

cube-portfolio-3.js

cube-portfolio-3.js

62 ms

bootstrap-session-timeout.min.js

bootstrap-session-timeout.min.js

60 ms

our-custom.js

our-custom.js

276 ms

custom.js

custom.js

271 ms

Kd8N0K_heiA

Kd8N0K_heiA

212 ms

si7E7BGGUNk

si7E7BGGUNk

597 ms

Fb8t6U6QDUs

Fb8t6U6QDUs

637 ms

P01icyLogo.png

P01icyLogo.png

128 ms

shopping-bag.png

shopping-bag.png

127 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

128 ms

contract.png

contract.png

127 ms

flask.png

flask.png

126 ms

laptop.png

laptop.png

129 ms

checked.png

checked.png

128 ms

InfoBeyondLogoFooter.png

InfoBeyondLogoFooter.png

128 ms

map-img.png

map-img.png

129 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

462 ms

font

font

16 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

15 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

33 ms

base.js

base.js

55 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

387 ms

FollowCompany.js

FollowCompany.js

635 ms

bpc16QBfL2kQ_bKRB2HbvtPTfk1rk9b6CTqi5DIFZjk.js

bpc16QBfL2kQ_bKRB2HbvtPTfk1rk9b6CTqi5DIFZjk.js

382 ms

embed.js

embed.js

268 ms

id

id

68 ms

Create

Create

191 ms

Create

Create

193 ms

Accessibility Review

securitypolicytool.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

securitypolicytool.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

securitypolicytool.com SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Securitypolicytool.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Securitypolicytool.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

securitypolicytool.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Security Policy Tool. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: