Tools & Wizards About Us
securityreviewer.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 61

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

securityreviewer.com

The Ultimate Application Inspector | Security Reviewer

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

350 ms

Resources Loaded

894 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

securityreviewer.com screenshot

About Website

Visit securityreviewer.com now to see the best up-to-date Security Reviewer content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about securityreviewer.com

Security Reviewer scans a large number of different languages source code (C#, Vb.NET, VB6, ASP, ASPX, JAVA, JSP, JavaScript, TypeScript, eScript, Java Server Faces, Ruby, Python, R, GO, Kotlin, Cloju...

Visit securityreviewer.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Securityreviewer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 350 ms and then it took 894 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

securityreviewer.com performance score

61

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

16/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

55/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.047

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

57/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

securityreviewer.com

350 ms

www.securityreviewer.com

346 ms

styleSR.css

115 ms

gtm.js

16 ms

gtm.js

54 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Securityreviewer.com, 40% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (350 ms) belongs to the original domain Securityreviewer.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 kB (47%)

Content Size

2.3 kB

After Optimization

1.2 kB

  • HTML

In fact, the total size of Securityreviewer.com main page is 2.3 kB. This result falls within a big category (top 100 000) of medium weight web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 2.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 2.3 kB
  • After minification 2.2 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 47% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Security Reviewer. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

securityreviewer.com

securityreviewer.com

350 ms

www.securityreviewer.com

www.securityreviewer.com

346 ms

styleSR.css

styleSR.css

115 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

16 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

54 ms

Accessibility Review

securityreviewer.com accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

securityreviewer.com best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

securityreviewer.com SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Securityreviewer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Securityreviewer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

securityreviewer.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Security Reviewer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: