2.7 sec in total
235 ms
2.2 sec
253 ms
Click here to check amazing Securityshells content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about securityshells.com
Cybernetics Software provides HID access control system, biometric time attendance system, HID controllers, ESSL biometric time attendance system, ESSL access control system, Software to ESSL time att...
Visit securityshells.comWe analyzed Securityshells.com page load time and found that the first response time was 235 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
securityshells.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
63/100
10%
Value7.7 s
3/100
25%
Value5.1 s
62/100
10%
Value330 ms
75/100
30%
Value0.097
90/100
15%
Value6.6 s
57/100
10%
235 ms
467 ms
160 ms
301 ms
230 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Securityshells.com, 21% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (927 ms) belongs to the original domain Securityshells.com.
Page size can be reduced by 484.6 kB (9%)
5.2 MB
4.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Securityshells.com main page is 5.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.3 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 291.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Securityshells images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 136.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 136.0 kB or 33% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Securityshells.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.5 kB or 34% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (43%)
54
31
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Securityshells. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
securityshells.com
235 ms
www.securityshells.com
467 ms
bootstrap.min.css
160 ms
style.css
301 ms
font-awesome.min.css
230 ms
animate.css
237 ms
jquery-ui.css
240 ms
renew.css
242 ms
news.css
255 ms
logo.png
354 ms
slogo1.png
356 ms
jquery.js
393 ms
jquery-ui.js
580 ms
bootstrap.min.js
358 ms
main.js
385 ms
demo.js
392 ms
wow.min.js
405 ms
script.js
435 ms
HID-logo.png
462 ms
iSecure-Logo.png
468 ms
I-Trace.png
470 ms
I-Cafe.png
468 ms
I-Track.png
521 ms
logo1.png
540 ms
tatasmslogo.png
548 ms
icon2.png
545 ms
imProvelogo.png
548 ms
logo1.png
612 ms
archive2.svg
615 ms
ISO_White@300x.png
631 ms
acc5.png
624 ms
time12.png
625 ms
vis11.png
663 ms
payroll.png
678 ms
sms5.png
691 ms
c1.png
701 ms
default
116 ms
aboutslide1.png
927 ms
accessslide.png
768 ms
slider16.png
731 ms
Door-Access-Control.png
747 ms
slider5.png
679 ms
slider7.png
766 ms
slider9.png
831 ms
customslide.png
814 ms
map.png
784 ms
footer1.png
800 ms
sourcesanspro-regular-webfont.woff
801 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
849 ms
sourcesanspro-semibold-webfont.woff
834 ms
twk-arr-find-polyfill.js
58 ms
twk-object-values-polyfill.js
86 ms
twk-event-polyfill.js
67 ms
twk-entries-polyfill.js
79 ms
twk-iterator-polyfill.js
81 ms
twk-promise-polyfill.js
69 ms
twk-main.js
117 ms
twk-vendor.js
170 ms
twk-chunk-vendors.js
220 ms
twk-chunk-common.js
233 ms
twk-runtime.js
155 ms
twk-app.js
155 ms
securityshells.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
securityshells.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
securityshells.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Securityshells.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Securityshells.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
securityshells.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Securityshells. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: