Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

sedgwick-richardson.com

Sedgwick Richardson

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

412 ms

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

505 ms

sedgwick-richardson.com screenshot

About Website

Visit sedgwick-richardson.com now to see the best up-to-date Sedgwick Richardson content for Hong Kong and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sedgwick-richardson.com

Brand and sustainability consultancy. We build brands that drive shared value for business, society, and our environment.

Visit sedgwick-richardson.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sedgwick-richardson.com page load time and found that the first response time was 412 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sedgwick-richardson.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,960 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.7 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sedgwick-richardson.com

412 ms

www.sedgwick-richardson.com

433 ms

M9RPzs8rSUwu0U3LL8rVNdfPzEvOKU1JLdZPLi7WLy6pzEktBgA.css

337 ms

language-selector.css

331 ms

font-awesome.min.css

250 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Sedgwick-richardson.com, 11% (5 requests) were made to Fast.fonts.net and 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Sedgwick-richardson.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 872.7 kB (40%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Sedgwick-richardson.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 29.4 kB

  • Original 35.5 kB
  • After minification 20.4 kB
  • After compression 6.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.1 kB, which is 43% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 76.4 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sedgwick Richardson images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 494.7 kB

  • Original 704.6 kB
  • After minification 704.4 kB
  • After compression 210.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 494.7 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 272.1 kB

  • Original 323.0 kB
  • After minification 319.9 kB
  • After compression 50.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sedgwick-richardson.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 272.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (46%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

20

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sedgwick Richardson. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

sedgwick-richardson.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

sedgwick-richardson.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

sedgwick-richardson.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sedgwick-richardson.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sedgwick-richardson.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sedgwick Richardson. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: