8.7 sec in total
918 ms
7.6 sec
250 ms
Visit sedicon.no now to see the best up-to-date Sedicon content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sedicon.no
SediCon is a supplier of proven and reliable sediment handling solutions. With in depth knowledge and in-house developed technology, SediCon can incre...
Visit sedicon.noWe analyzed Sedicon.no page load time and found that the first response time was 918 ms and then it took 7.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
sedicon.no performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
48/100
10%
Value7.6 s
4/100
25%
Value6.0 s
46/100
10%
Value520 ms
56/100
30%
Value0.293
41/100
15%
Value7.2 s
50/100
10%
918 ms
272 ms
639 ms
262 ms
258 ms
Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Sedicon.no, 18% (18 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 9% (9 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Sedicon.no.
Page size can be reduced by 832.3 kB (38%)
2.2 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Sedicon.no main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 68.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sedicon images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 643.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 643.7 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 99.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sedicon.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 99.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (61%)
92
36
The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sedicon. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
918 ms
modal.css
272 ms
k2.css
639 ms
menu.gkmenu.css
262 ms
meyer.css
258 ms
layout.css
399 ms
joomla.css
681 ms
template.css
644 ms
menu.css
526 ms
gk.stuff.css
509 ms
style1.css
527 ms
template.css
640 ms
template.css.php
657 ms
dropdown_menu_left.css
766 ms
style.css
646 ms
mootools-core.js
1159 ms
core.js
788 ms
modal.js
789 ms
jquery.min.js
10 ms
k2.js
686 ms
mootools-more.js
1535 ms
menu.gkmenu.js
773 ms
gk.scripts.js
817 ms
jquery.min.js
12 ms
jquery.fpss.js
902 ms
dropdown_menu.js
1187 ms
page.png
1034 ms
body_bak.png
816 ms
logo_hvit.png
130 ms
menu_active.png
134 ms
arrow3.png
131 ms
loading_black.gif
258 ms
5_ffee2447b152494b43d9816faaea83c8_m.jpg
460 ms
6_ada9a09acea936d776a6f55c82778c43_m.jpg
488 ms
7_9caa2793658f3cc387f216157300b1ce_m.jpg
906 ms
nav-active.gif
361 ms
menu_bullet.png
386 ms
5_ffee2447b152494b43d9816faaea83c8_t.jpg
490 ms
6_ada9a09acea936d776a6f55c82778c43_t.jpg
538 ms
7_9caa2793658f3cc387f216157300b1ce_t.jpg
618 ms
en.gif
723 ms
es.gif
723 ms
f4b6dca0e2911082f0eb6e1df1a0e11d_M.jpg
1108 ms
Internetnsp_114.png
795 ms
Sedicon_dredge_operating_in_El_Canada_reservoir_2nsp_114.jpg
1013 ms
ms
81 ms
ga.js
22 ms
__utm.gif
15 ms
embed
465 ms
rs=ABjfnFXyvl74eQtNkPr0yPNSPx_QTeMOEQ
23 ms
css
63 ms
js
61 ms
rs=ABjfnFVj2c6_lUpgxbr93j8J5XcedEcimw
41 ms
rs=ABjfnFVj2c6_lUpgxbr93j8J5XcedEcimw
39 ms
common.js
32 ms
map.js
45 ms
overlay.js
72 ms
22-blue-dot.png&filter=ff&scale=1.0
153 ms
util.js
91 ms
marker.js
83 ms
geocoder.js
84 ms
controls.js
73 ms
places_impl.js
73 ms
61-green-dot.png&filter=ff&scale=1.0
176 ms
123-red-dot.png&filter=ff&scale=1.0
188 ms
selection_2x-000.png
55 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
126 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
141 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
174 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
178 ms
gen204
75 ms
stats.js
96 ms
onion.js
85 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
138 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
83 ms
kh
126 ms
kh
125 ms
kh
123 ms
kh
124 ms
transparent.png
130 ms
mapcnt6.png
58 ms
tmapctrl4.png
39 ms
vt
20 ms
vt
26 ms
vt
22 ms
vt
25 ms
vt
22 ms
viewer-icons001.png
83 ms
star4.png
86 ms
22-blue-dot.png&scale=1.0
75 ms
gen204
89 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
47 ms
MyMaps_Icons003.png
22 ms
mymaps_32.png
28 ms
v1_4593b7d7.png
32 ms
google-my-maps-logo-small-001.png
32 ms
61-green-dot.png&scale=1.0
25 ms
123-red-dot.png&scale=1.0
31 ms
sedicon.no accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
sedicon.no best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
sedicon.no SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sedicon.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sedicon.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sedicon.no
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sedicon. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: