25.5 sec in total
7.4 sec
17.9 sec
262 ms
Click here to check amazing Seeplot content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about seeplot.com
SEO每天一贴研究seo(搜索引擎优化)技术、网络营销及电子商务思考。《SEO实战密码》第3版2015年7月上市,各网上书店有售。以后再也不写书啦。
Visit seeplot.comWe analyzed Seeplot.com page load time and found that the first response time was 7.4 sec and then it took 18.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
seeplot.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.7 s
100/100
10%
Value0.7 s
100/100
25%
Value1.3 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value0.7 s
100/100
10%
7370 ms
1094 ms
1035 ms
1656 ms
1119 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Seeplot.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Bdimg.share.baidu.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Hm.baidu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Seeplot.com.
Page size can be reduced by 697.7 kB (69%)
1.0 MB
313.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Seeplot.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 500.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.8 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.1 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Seeplot images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 319.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 319.2 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 349.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Seeplot.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 349.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (73%)
45
12
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Seeplot. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
seeplot.com
7370 ms
style.css
1094 ms
hm.js
1035 ms
ga.js
1656 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1119 ms
cm.css
1160 ms
polls-css.css
1594 ms
jquery.js
2876 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1688 ms
loader.js
2336 ms
logger.js
2098 ms
bdsstyle.css
3584 ms
bds_s_v2.js
2744 ms
autoresize.jquery.min.js
2297 ms
polls-js.js
2661 ms
wp-embed.min.js
2914 ms
hm.gif
899 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
652 ms
__utm.gif
14 ms
ga.js
9 ms
hm.js
1048 ms
bdsstyle.css
495 ms
getnum
453 ms
shadow_top.gif
681 ms
icon_feed.gif
682 ms
is.png
680 ms
sc.png
678 ms
profile-2.jpg
680 ms
misty.jpg
286 ms
widget_blog.html
1096 ms
is.png
248 ms
sc.png
442 ms
underline1.jpg
676 ms
sideheadtop.gif
746 ms
common.css
1716 ms
boot.js
665 ms
lang_zh.js
1230 ms
widget_blog_new.js
1165 ms
public.css
2822 ms
mib_widget.css
1059 ms
wd.css
1233 ms
lang_zh.js
8 ms
widget_blog_new.js
11 ms
tmp.gif
663 ms
tmp.gif
984 ms
ico.png
40 ms
1
750 ms
transparent.gif
751 ms
wgt_slide.gif
682 ms
wgt_trans.gif
680 ms
wgt_bg.gif
752 ms
wgt_elem.gif
686 ms
aa22a4dejw1exr6jhbn4pj21f02io4qq.jpg
1279 ms
tooth.gif
2982 ms
9e33b6c4jw1euly70hdotj218g0xcdot.jpg
1293 ms
620bfba3jw1es8qw2diwuj20c80fcmxx.jpg
2204 ms
logo_txt.png
1405 ms
seeplot.com accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
seeplot.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
seeplot.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Seeplot.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Seeplot.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
seeplot.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Seeplot. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: