Tools & Wizards About Us
select-eyecare.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

select-eyecare.com

LASIK Towson | Cataract Surgery Towson | Select Eye Care

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

462 ms

Resources Loaded

811 ms

Page Rendered

430 ms

select-eyecare.com screenshot

About Website

Visit select-eyecare.com now to see the best up-to-date Select Eye Care content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about select-eyecare.com

Cataract Surgery and Glaucoma treatment options available at Select Eye Care. Full service eye doctor. Serving Elkridge MD, Towson MD and the surrounding communities.

Visit select-eyecare.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Select-eyecare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 462 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

select-eyecare.com performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

92/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,020 ms

26/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.063

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.0 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

select-eyecare.com

462 ms

bootstrap-reboot.css

63 ms

bootstrap.min.css

52 ms

css2

63 ms

font-awesome.min.css

66 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Select-eyecare.com, 10% (4 requests) were made to Stackpath.bootstrapcdn.com and 10% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (462 ms) belongs to the original domain Select-eyecare.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 227.1 kB (18%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Select-eyecare.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 98.0 kB

  • Original 108.8 kB
  • After minification 66.7 kB
  • After compression 10.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 42.1 kB, which is 39% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 98.0 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 125.0 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 981.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Select Eye Care needs image optimization as it can save up to 125.0 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 524 B

  • Original 13.1 kB
  • After minification 13.1 kB
  • After compression 12.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 3.5 kB

  • Original 15.3 kB
  • After minification 15.3 kB
  • After compression 11.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Select-eyecare.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (54%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Select Eye Care. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

select-eyecare.com

select-eyecare.com

462 ms

bootstrap-reboot.css

bootstrap-reboot.css

63 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

52 ms

css2

css2

63 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

66 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

30 ms

global.css

global.css

58 ms

cookies-message.css

cookies-message.css

62 ms

js

js

191 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

40 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

98 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

100 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

60 ms

cookies-message.js

cookies-message.js

62 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

153 ms

SEC-iStock-830668718-72_1669659153.jpg

SEC-iStock-830668718-72_1669659153.jpg

120 ms

iStock-1440699348-72_1697815611.jpg

iStock-1440699348-72_1697815611.jpg

127 ms

iStock-1223351863-72-copy1_1669659594.jpg

iStock-1223351863-72-copy1_1669659594.jpg

127 ms

select-eyecare-logo.png

select-eyecare-logo.png

127 ms

search-icon-large.png

search-icon-large.png

127 ms

chevron-down-thin.png

chevron-down-thin.png

126 ms

c7051de4-3a8c-4920-bc19-885fa1d3556cRxSight-LAL-Social-Media-Ad-1200x630-editable_1683146549.png

c7051de4-3a8c-4920-bc19-885fa1d3556cRxSight-LAL-Social-Media-Ad-1200x630-editable_1683146549.png

254 ms

arrow-rt-white.png

arrow-rt-white.png

156 ms

pause-button.png

pause-button.png

155 ms

play-button.png

play-button.png

156 ms

Scott-LaBorwit-New_1689023787.jpg

Scott-LaBorwit-New_1689023787.jpg

156 ms

arrow-rt-color.png

arrow-rt-color.png

156 ms

Samantha-Williamson-New_1689023843.jpg

Samantha-Williamson-New_1689023843.jpg

158 ms

Roma-Desai-New_1689023895.jpg

Roma-Desai-New_1689023895.jpg

160 ms

Trey-Haugen-New_1689023943.jpg

Trey-Haugen-New_1689023943.jpg

159 ms

Erwin-Puente-New_1689023990.jpg

Erwin-Puente-New_1689023990.jpg

187 ms

Rachel-Cho-New_1689024093.jpg

Rachel-Cho-New_1689024093.jpg

188 ms

large-quote-marks.png

large-quote-marks.png

188 ms

vip-partners-white.png

vip-partners-white.png

189 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew9Y3tco5q6.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew9Y3tco5q6.woff

125 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew9Y3tco5q6.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew9Y3tco5q6.woff

126 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w9Y3tco5q6.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w9Y3tco5q6.woff

154 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w9Y3tco5q6.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w9Y3tco5q6.woff

155 ms

toggle-arrow-prev.png

toggle-arrow-prev.png

95 ms

toggle-arrow-next.png

toggle-arrow-next.png

96 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

50 ms

Accessibility Review

select-eyecare.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

select-eyecare.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

select-eyecare.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Select-eyecare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Select-eyecare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

select-eyecare.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Select Eye Care. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: