8.8 sec in total
1.7 sec
6.6 sec
501 ms
Click here to check amazing Selector content for Australia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about selector.com
Find products for architecture, interior, building and landscape. Products with inspiring images and detailed information.
Visit selector.comWe analyzed Selector.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
selector.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value11.0 s
0/100
25%
Value9.7 s
10/100
10%
Value270 ms
82/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value12.3 s
15/100
10%
1672 ms
643 ms
29 ms
482 ms
437 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 18% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Selector.com, 18% (16 requests) were made to Assets3.selector.com and 11% (10 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) relates to the external source Assets2.selector.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (51%)
2.3 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Selector.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 76.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.5 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Selector images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 793.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 793.8 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 258.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Selector.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 258.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (38%)
84
52
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Selector. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
au
1672 ms
style.css
643 ms
conversion.js
29 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
482 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
437 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
479 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.min.js
479 ms
plugins.js
479 ms
tracker.js
653 ms
script.js
657 ms
atrk.js
45 ms
gpt.js
27 ms
638x348-crop.jpg
968 ms
638x348-crop.jpg
968 ms
198x132-crop.png
802 ms
198x132-crop.jpg
1276 ms
198x132-crop.jpg
2752 ms
198x132-crop.jpg
3324 ms
198x132-crop.jpg
3350 ms
198x132-crop.jpg
534 ms
198x132-crop.jpg
2460 ms
198x132-crop.jpg
2459 ms
198x132-crop.png
3765 ms
100x67-crop.jpg
3333 ms
198x132-crop.jpg
1279 ms
198x132-crop.jpg
2302 ms
198x132-crop.jpg
2299 ms
198x132-crop.jpg
2302 ms
198x132-crop.jpg
2752 ms
198x132-crop.jpg
1188 ms
198x132-crop.jpg
1407 ms
198x132-crop.jpg
1499 ms
100x67-crop.jpg
1624 ms
selector-logo-black.png
308 ms
198x132-crop.jpg
2307 ms
198x132-crop.jpg
2632 ms
198x132-crop.jpg
2486 ms
198x132-crop.jpg
2749 ms
198x132-crop.jpg
3337 ms
198x132-crop.jpg
1181 ms
198x132-crop.jpg
1400 ms
198x132-crop.jpg
1618 ms
198x132-crop.jpg
1836 ms
198x132-crop.jpg
2055 ms
198x132-crop.jpg
2273 ms
198x132-crop.jpg
2492 ms
198x132-crop.jpg
2526 ms
100x67-crop.png
2702 ms
100x67-crop.jpg
2710 ms
selector-logo.png
291 ms
selector-sprite.png
291 ms
pubads_impl_81.js
20 ms
bcf54343-d033-41ee-bbd7-2b77df3fe7ba.woff
663 ms
14ff6081-326d-4dae-b778-d7afa66166fc.woff
802 ms
analytics.js
66 ms
ads
190 ms
container.html
13 ms
linkid.js
23 ms
45 ms
collect
13 ms
collect
201 ms
sidebarv2.js
284 ms
atrk.gif
187 ms
collect
146 ms
log
2351 ms
collect
63 ms
collect
63 ms
collect
62 ms
collect
62 ms
collect
62 ms
collect
63 ms
spinner.gif
228 ms
15712494312786728705
111 ms
16593621332880208144
48 ms
3928821108298235642
44 ms
17335565051807619076
49 ms
15983974973252906938
49 ms
osd.js
24 ms
test.png
174 ms
css
60 ms
sidebar-8593adbccc13a6ce631cce272e1417c8.js
77 ms
sidebar-d41abf9a427ab1050487f0791c4b3413.css
58 ms
cors_check
154 ms
activeview
12 ms
activeview
14 ms
nr-768.min.js
17 ms
5f0c0e703a
55 ms
selector.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
selector.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
selector.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Selector.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Selector.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
selector.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Selector. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: