1.9 sec in total
292 ms
1.4 sec
186 ms
Visit senderbase.org now to see the best up-to-date Senderbase content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about senderbase.org
As of April 20, 2023, we are decommissioning SenderBase.org and any attempts to visit that web page will fail.
Visit senderbase.orgWe analyzed Senderbase.org page load time and found that the first response time was 292 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
senderbase.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.3 s
1/100
10%
Value14.0 s
0/100
25%
Value9.9 s
10/100
10%
Value3,950 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.039
100/100
15%
Value15.7 s
6/100
10%
292 ms
13 ms
38 ms
27 ms
47 ms
Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 37% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Senderbase.org, 15% (15 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 9% (9 requests) were made to Pbs.twimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (374 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.syndication.twimg.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (53%)
2.1 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Senderbase.org main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 58.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Senderbase images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 987.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 987.6 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Senderbase.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (60%)
94
38
The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Senderbase. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.senderbase.org
292 ms
core.css
13 ms
custom.css
38 ms
gmap.css
27 ms
jquery.min.js
47 ms
jquery.cookie.js
22 ms
jquery.ba-hashchange.js
26 ms
jquery.placeholder.min.js
27 ms
base.js
31 ms
jquery.flot.min.js
65 ms
jquery.flot.pie.min.js
44 ms
gmap.js
36 ms
dynamic_table.js
39 ms
top_senders.js
66 ms
utils.js
62 ms
widgets.js
62 ms
feedek.js
64 ms
home.js
64 ms
ga.js
41 ms
js
62 ms
154 ms
widgets.js
96 ms
all.js
95 ms
plusone.js
151 ms
load
52 ms
headerblue_gradient.jpg
35 ms
cisco_logo.png
34 ms
search_button.png
35 ms
mm_20_green.png
35 ms
mm_20_red.png
33 ms
mm_20_blue.png
69 ms
cisco_wave.png
69 ms
blog_icon.png
66 ms
social_back.png
126 ms
facebook_button.png
66 ms
arrow_right.gif
68 ms
youtube_button.png
69 ms
cisco-asr-cover-512.jpg
156 ms
new_window.png
70 ms
__utm.gif
42 ms
262 ms
timeline.1b43d11859b7663a2225b885f87704a5.js
154 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
178 ms
191 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
14 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
37 ms
fastbutton
90 ms
xd_arbiter.php
105 ms
xd_arbiter.php
162 ms
postmessageRelay
50 ms
api.js
37 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
111 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
61 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
31 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
38 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
80 ms
syndication
199 ms
628547400160837632
374 ms
common.js
39 ms
map.js
57 ms
util.js
98 ms
marker.js
56 ms
tweet_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html
85 ms
onion.js
71 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
73 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
67 ms
stats.js
56 ms
controls.js
60 ms
mm_34_red.png
31 ms
transparent.png
53 ms
css
50 ms
mm_34_blue.png
41 ms
mm_34_green.png
41 ms
vt
29 ms
vt
26 ms
google4.png
23 ms
mapcnt6.png
23 ms
vt
22 ms
vt
25 ms
vt
23 ms
tmapctrl.png
20 ms
cb_scout5.png
21 ms
tmapctrl4.png
21 ms
imgs8.png
22 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
10 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
11 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
19 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
19 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
130 ms
timeline.4d087f49a21e27038d9769d7c976b8fa.default.css
29 ms
timeline.4d087f49a21e27038d9769d7c976b8fa.default.css
87 ms
a47f808d60e06da480a388dc57c86d26_normal.png
64 ms
o-OLQ3ql_normal.jpg
58 ms
obQURwX7_normal.jpg
59 ms
61b419cc50785ca24ff68b41956e9a1a_normal.jpeg
60 ms
KurtBike_normal.JPG
60 ms
GgxnZOai_normal.jpg
61 ms
eye_normal.png
61 ms
CcKZrfhWIAUa4L6.jpg:small
62 ms
CbdKM0LUkAASXDE.jpg:small
63 ms
senderbase.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
No form fields have multiple labels
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
senderbase.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
senderbase.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Senderbase.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Senderbase.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
senderbase.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Senderbase. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: