Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 58

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 25% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

senquip.com

Senquip – Sensor connectivity made easy

Page Load Speed

31.2 sec in total

First Response

14 ms

Resources Loaded

30.2 sec

Page Rendered

957 ms

senquip.com screenshot

About Website

Visit senquip.com now to see the best up-to-date Senquip content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about senquip.com

The Senquip ORB is a rugged industrial Remote Telemetry Device (RTU) that connects to almost any sensor, system or plant and equipment and sends measured data to the Senquip Portal, a company server o...

Visit senquip.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Senquip.com page load time and found that the first response time was 14 ms and then it took 31.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

senquip.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value27.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.9 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value310 ms

78/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.795

5/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.8 s

36/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

senquip.com

14 ms

senquip.com

60 ms

js

88 ms

css

48 ms

css

58 ms

Our browser made a total of 318 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (288 requests) were addressed to the original Senquip.com, 2% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Senquip.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 320.1 kB (3%)

Content Size

9.4 MB

After Optimization

9.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Senquip.com main page is 9.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 8.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 221.7 kB

  • Original 247.5 kB
  • After minification 179.0 kB
  • After compression 25.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 68.6 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 221.7 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 91.1 kB

  • Original 8.9 MB
  • After minification 8.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Senquip images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 5.7 kB

  • Original 237.4 kB
  • After minification 237.4 kB
  • After compression 231.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 94.3 kB
  • After minification 94.3 kB
  • After compression 92.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Senquip.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (7%)

Requests Now

307

After Optimization

284

The browser has sent 307 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Senquip. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

senquip.com accessibility score

58

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

senquip.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

senquip.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Senquip.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Senquip.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Senquip. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: