4.8 sec in total
243 ms
3.4 sec
1.2 sec
Visit seo-company.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date SEO Company content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about seo-company.co.uk
Best SEO company in the UK, optimising websites since 2004. Top rated professional SEO strategies. ONLINE APPOINTMENTS Google Partners.
Visit seo-company.co.ukWe analyzed Seo-company.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 243 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
seo-company.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
60/100
10%
Value3.0 s
79/100
25%
Value6.4 s
41/100
10%
Value980 ms
28/100
30%
Value0.161
73/100
15%
Value9.3 s
31/100
10%
243 ms
491 ms
41 ms
79 ms
46 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Seo-company.co.uk, 87% (62 requests) were made to Iconquer.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Iconquer.com.
Page size can be reduced by 179.5 kB (26%)
689.1 kB
509.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Seo-company.co.uk main page is 689.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 419.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 129.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 129.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SEO Company images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 22.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Seo-company.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.7 kB or 38% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (37%)
63
40
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SEO Company. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
seo-company.co.uk
243 ms
www.iconquer.com
491 ms
b2aa4.css
41 ms
css2
79 ms
7db6a.css
46 ms
87ec0.js
50 ms
a5ff7.css
38 ms
877fd.css
50 ms
b56bd.css
75 ms
04901.js
54 ms
611c0.css
63 ms
js
316 ms
email-decode.min.js
7 ms
4d074.css
179 ms
31730.js
258 ms
b68ea.js
190 ms
ef0aa.js
178 ms
87a61.js
189 ms
6d54b.js
256 ms
api.js
296 ms
d2e6a.js
294 ms
ae959.js
293 ms
1615d.js
291 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
403 ms
phone-icon.gif
132 ms
SEO-Services.png
339 ms
Web-Design.png
411 ms
PPC-Marketing.png
335 ms
Content-Writing.png
336 ms
Website-Analysis.png
336 ms
Competitor-Analysis.png
539 ms
Link-Research.png
585 ms
Keyword-Research.png
617 ms
hkgrotesk-light-webfont.woff
330 ms
recaptcha__en.js
119 ms
open_24_display_st-webfont.woff
181 ms
hkgrotesk-semibold-webfont.woff
182 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
669 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
649 ms
analytics.js
132 ms
iconquer-logo.png
410 ms
free-website-audit.png
653 ms
arrow-left.png
578 ms
trustpilot-logo.jpg
625 ms
probably-the-best-web-optimisers-on-the-planet-1595x639.png
695 ms
analyse-the-competition-and-conquer.webp
575 ms
UK-Property-Finance.jpg
808 ms
DJKIT.jpg
816 ms
DIY-Splashbacks.jpg
855 ms
allspeeds-logo-small.jpg
950 ms
investors-chronicle-small.jpg
899 ms
jps-logo-small-1.jpg
1031 ms
manchesterdrivertraining-logo-small.jpg
1100 ms
evvr-home-automation-small.jpg
1097 ms
london-plastercraft-ltd.jpg
1136 ms
riversideshutterslondon-logo-small.jpg
1186 ms
creating-ideas-360x247.png
1485 ms
Has-Google-Rolled-Out-Another-Major-Late-September-Update-360x247.png
1531 ms
Microsites-360x247.png
1498 ms
Google-Reviews.jpg
1350 ms
Trust-Pilot.jpg
1389 ms
semfirms-logo.jpg
1461 ms
Google-Partner.jpg
1586 ms
arrow.png
1602 ms
spinner.gif
1388 ms
livechat-thumb.jpg
1690 ms
ajax-loader.gif
1687 ms
collect
30 ms
collect
56 ms
ga-audiences
20 ms
responsive.css
385 ms
seo-company.co.uk accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
seo-company.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
seo-company.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Seo-company.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Seo-company.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
seo-company.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of SEO Company. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: