Tools & Wizards About Us
seochecker.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 78

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    39% of websites

seochecker.com

Analyze Websites With Free SEO Audit & Reporting Tool - SEOptimer

Page Load Speed

5.3 sec in total

First Response

184 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

seochecker.com screenshot

About Website

Visit seochecker.com now to see the best up-to-date SEO Checker content for Poland and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about seochecker.com

Looking for the best SEO Audit Tool to analyze and grade your website? SEOptimer is the web's best SEO Checker. Improve your website, rank better in Search Engines and win more customers with bea...

Visit seochecker.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Seochecker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 184 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

seochecker.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

70/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.8 s

23/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,490 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.1 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

seochecker.com

184 ms

www.seoptimer.com

484 ms

4ad38ea46e233a403459c97ac1706ee9.css

351 ms

responsive.css

212 ms

381b1a3ea998eb32152aa130f63e6795.css

218 ms

Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Seochecker.com, 93% (65 requests) were made to Seoptimer.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Seoptimer.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 275.0 kB (18%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Seochecker.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 165.2 kB

  • Original 206.5 kB
  • After minification 176.5 kB
  • After compression 41.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 30.0 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 165.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 108.9 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 996.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SEO Checker images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 62 B

  • Original 94.7 kB
  • After minification 94.7 kB
  • After compression 94.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 815 B

  • Original 115.0 kB
  • After minification 115.0 kB
  • After compression 114.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Seochecker.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (28%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

46

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SEO Checker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

seochecker.com

seochecker.com

184 ms

www.seoptimer.com

www.seoptimer.com

484 ms

4ad38ea46e233a403459c97ac1706ee9.css

4ad38ea46e233a403459c97ac1706ee9.css

351 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

212 ms

381b1a3ea998eb32152aa130f63e6795.css

381b1a3ea998eb32152aa130f63e6795.css

218 ms

flag-icon.min.css

flag-icon.min.css

202 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

207 ms

brands.css

brands.css

233 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

408 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

478 ms

e481e6ef5e4741c556629ae67832c175.js

e481e6ef5e4741c556629ae67832c175.js

709 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

354 ms

logo_nav.png

logo_nav.png

286 ms

seo-audit.webp

seo-audit.webp

533 ms

white-label.webp

white-label.webp

399 ms

embeddable-audit-tool.webp

embeddable-audit-tool.webp

397 ms

keyword-research-tool.webp

keyword-research-tool.webp

399 ms

bc_overview_tab_en.png

bc_overview_tab_en.png

536 ms

seo-crawler.webp

seo-crawler.webp

468 ms

bulk-reporting.webp

bulk-reporting.webp

607 ms

keyword-tracking-tool.webp

keyword-tracking-tool.webp

608 ms

mb_changes_dashboard_chart_en.png

mb_changes_dashboard_chart_en.png

749 ms

seo-api.webp

seo-api.webp

680 ms

free-tools.webp

free-tools.webp

740 ms

52.svg

52.svg

746 ms

user.svg

user.svg

826 ms

line-shape-11.svg

line-shape-11.svg

828 ms

g2-2023-spring-leader.svg

g2-2023-spring-leader.svg

891 ms

g2.svg

g2.svg

953 ms

g2-2023-spring-sb.svg

g2-2023-spring-sb.svg

956 ms

deloitte.png

deloitte.png

1029 ms

iprospect.png

iprospect.png

1034 ms

ogilvy.png

ogilvy.png

1106 ms

publicis_sapient.png

publicis_sapient.png

1166 ms

shopify.png

shopify.png

1218 ms

index_en.png

index_en.png

1445 ms

comprehensive_website_audit_en.png

comprehensive_website_audit_en.png

1371 ms

pdf_reports_en.png

pdf_reports_en.png

1449 ms

languages_and_options_en.png

languages_and_options_en.png

1505 ms

embed_tool_example_en.png

embed_tool_example_en.png

1563 ms

diy_seo_en.png

diy_seo_en.png

1635 ms

diy_free_seo_toolbox_en.png

diy_free_seo_toolbox_en.png

1708 ms

228.jpg

228.jpg

1647 ms

229.jpg

229.jpg

1656 ms

101.svg

101.svg

1712 ms

kay-digitelle.jpg

kay-digitelle.jpg

1779 ms

dillon.jpeg

dillon.jpeg

1701 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

59 ms

vincent.jpeg

vincent.jpeg

1572 ms

gordita_regular-webfont.woff

gordita_regular-webfont.woff

1651 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

gordita_medium-webfont.woff

gordita_medium-webfont.woff

1598 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1669 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

1814 ms

amy.jpeg

amy.jpeg

1588 ms

taavi.jpeg

taavi.jpeg

1528 ms

natalie.jpeg

natalie.jpeg

1626 ms

226.jpg

226.jpg

1600 ms

227.jpg

227.jpg

1661 ms

239.svg

239.svg

1595 ms

240.svg

240.svg

1538 ms

232.svg

232.svg

1624 ms

233.svg

233.svg

1670 ms

234.svg

234.svg

1599 ms

235.svg

235.svg

1645 ms

236.svg

236.svg

1589 ms

logo_tuberanker_nav.svg

logo_tuberanker_nav.svg

1611 ms

logo_localranking_nav.png

logo_localranking_nav.png

1629 ms

saas.png

saas.png

1670 ms

nxc2nhce

nxc2nhce

26 ms

Accessibility Review

seochecker.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

seochecker.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

seochecker.com SEO score

78

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Seochecker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Seochecker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

seochecker.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SEO Checker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: