Tools & Wizards About Us
seochecker.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 48% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 78

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

seochecker.com

Analyze Websites With Free SEO Audit & Reporting Tool - SEOptimer

Page Load Speed

8.8 sec in total

First Response

214 ms

Resources Loaded

7.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

seochecker.com screenshot

About Website

Visit seochecker.com now to see the best up-to-date SEO Checker content for Poland and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about seochecker.com

Looking for the best SEO Audit Tool to analyze and grade your website? SEOptimer is the web's best SEO Checker. Improve your website, rank better in Search Engines and win more customers with bea...

Visit seochecker.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Seochecker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 214 ms and then it took 8.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

seochecker.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.9 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30,070 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.031

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value43.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

seochecker.com

214 ms

www.seoptimer.com

787 ms

css

31 ms

flag-icon.min.css

225 ms

common.css

224 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Seochecker.com, 55% (36 requests) were made to Seoptimer.com and 14% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) relates to the external source Seoptimer.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 892.7 kB (26%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Seochecker.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 252.3 kB

  • Original 306.8 kB
  • After minification 256.4 kB
  • After compression 54.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 50.4 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 252.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 639.7 kB

  • Original 2.7 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, SEO Checker needs image optimization as it can save up to 639.7 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 321 B

  • Original 282.4 kB
  • After minification 282.4 kB
  • After compression 282.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 400 B

  • Original 83.0 kB
  • After minification 83.0 kB
  • After compression 82.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Seochecker.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (34%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

35

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SEO Checker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

seochecker.com

seochecker.com

214 ms

www.seoptimer.com

www.seoptimer.com

787 ms

css

css

31 ms

flag-icon.min.css

flag-icon.min.css

225 ms

common.css

common.css

224 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

299 ms

50728b058bf6e54586ac565918675b8e.css

50728b058bf6e54586ac565918675b8e.css

384 ms

bootstrap-xl.css

bootstrap-xl.css

228 ms

3ffd3010af9e999a058ca0f8b19ac465.css

3ffd3010af9e999a058ca0f8b19ac465.css

282 ms

75166234b79ffbbc9b20399c252ec953.js

75166234b79ffbbc9b20399c252ec953.js

894 ms

clipboard.min.js

clipboard.min.js

581 ms

58823264afb265c7dc5f411042ca1f30.js

58823264afb265c7dc5f411042ca1f30.js

736 ms

39 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

370 ms

logo_nav.png

logo_nav.png

267 ms

report-preview_en.png

report-preview_en.png

1568 ms

deloitte.png

deloitte.png

1192 ms

iprospect.png

iprospect.png

1194 ms

ogilvy.png

ogilvy.png

1566 ms

publicis_sapient.png

publicis_sapient.png

1565 ms

shopify.png

shopify.png

1819 ms

g2-2022S-leader.png

g2-2022S-leader.png

1836 ms

g2-5.png

g2-5.png

2421 ms

g2-2022S-sb.png

g2-2022S-sb.png

2479 ms

comprehensive_website_audit_en.png

comprehensive_website_audit_en.png

2689 ms

pdf_reports_en.png

pdf_reports_en.png

2757 ms

languages_and_options_2.png

languages_and_options_2.png

2586 ms

embed_tool_example_en.png

embed_tool_example_en.png

2582 ms

what-is_en.png

what-is_en.png

3232 ms

seoptimer_seo_tools.png

seoptimer_seo_tools.png

2693 ms

kay-digitelle.jpg

kay-digitelle.jpg

2798 ms

dillon.jpeg

dillon.jpeg

2809 ms

vincent.jpeg

vincent.jpeg

2901 ms

amy.jpeg

amy.jpeg

2908 ms

taavi.jpeg

taavi.jpeg

2968 ms

natalie.jpeg

natalie.jpeg

3012 ms

background_dark.jpg

background_dark.jpg

3087 ms

background.jpg

background.jpg

3256 ms

logo_footer.png

logo_footer.png

3123 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrQ.ttf

936 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQ.ttf

1237 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrQ.ttf

1361 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrQ.ttf

1360 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrQ.ttf

1361 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrQ.ttf

1360 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQ.ttf

1359 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrQ.ttf

1488 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrQ.ttf

1489 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

3078 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

952 ms

uwt.js

uwt.js

1413 ms

pixel.js

pixel.js

1252 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

938 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

797 ms

m-outer-1e02661a8587829bfa8aff26a17a6522.html

m-outer-1e02661a8587829bfa8aff26a17a6522.html

101 ms

m-outer-945f047da5e8ad2631328de22d68a395.js

m-outer-945f047da5e8ad2631328de22d68a395.js

397 ms

196644267338438

196644267338438

360 ms

inner.html

inner.html

676 ms

rp.gif

rp.gif

670 ms

collect

collect

160 ms

adsct

adsct

200 ms

adsct

adsct

173 ms

collect

collect

135 ms

22 ms

shim.latest.js

shim.latest.js

13 ms

Accessibility Review

seochecker.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

seochecker.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

seochecker.com SEO score

78

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Seochecker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Seochecker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

seochecker.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SEO Checker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: