4 sec in total
280 ms
3.4 sec
301 ms
Click here to check amazing SEO Co content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about seoco.co.uk
The SEO Company: A Morecambe, Lancashire based search engine optimisation specialist. UK SEO services, news articles and resources.
Visit seoco.co.ukWe analyzed Seoco.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 280 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
seoco.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value10.0 s
0/100
25%
Value9.3 s
12/100
10%
Value510 ms
57/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value9.1 s
33/100
10%
280 ms
367 ms
822 ms
273 ms
447 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Seoco.co.uk, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Seoco.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (74%)
2.6 MB
658.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Seoco.co.uk main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 159.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 159.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, SEO Co needs image optimization as it can save up to 27.9 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 896.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 896.4 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 839.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Seoco.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 839.8 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (80%)
70
14
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SEO Co. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
seoco.co.uk
280 ms
seoco.co.uk
367 ms
www.seoco.co.uk
822 ms
style.min.css
273 ms
be-slider.css
447 ms
oshine-modules.css
545 ms
rs6.css
451 ms
typehub-public.css
281 ms
css
37 ms
tatsu.min.css
563 ms
style.css
366 ms
font-awesome.css
463 ms
tatsu-icons.css
460 ms
bb-press.css
536 ms
main.css
721 ms
top-header.css
555 ms
responsive-header.css
554 ms
multilevel-menu.css
627 ms
layout.css
637 ms
magnific-popup.css
648 ms
scrollbar.css
649 ms
flickity.css
658 ms
fonts.css
716 ms
style.css
728 ms
masterslider.main.css
832 ms
custom.css
740 ms
jquery.min.js
848 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
807 ms
revolution.tools.min.js
990 ms
rs6.min.js
1085 ms
webfont.min.js
847 ms
modernizr.js
898 ms
js
57 ms
comment-reply.min.js
925 ms
asyncloader.js
924 ms
core.min.js
939 ms
accordion.min.js
1034 ms
tabs.min.js
1035 ms
oshine-modules.js
1409 ms
es6-promise.auto.min.js
1036 ms
helpers.min.js
1079 ms
debouncedresize.min.js
815 ms
tatsu.min.js
1141 ms
perfect-scrollbar.jquery.js
1053 ms
script.js
975 ms
colored-logo.svg
95 ms
SEO-2.png
122 ms
SEO_icons-01.png
123 ms
SEO_icons-02.png
121 ms
SEO_icons-03.png
121 ms
SEO_icons-04.png
123 ms
SEO_icons-05.png
123 ms
SEO_icons-06.png
267 ms
js
99 ms
analytics.js
94 ms
wlp_gwjKBV1pqhv43IQ.ttf
175 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
176 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
175 ms
icomoon.woff
292 ms
tatsu-icons.ttf
292 ms
owlcarousel.js
168 ms
imagesloaded.js
166 ms
vivusSVGanimation.js
166 ms
tilt.min.js
174 ms
isotope.js
225 ms
begrid.min.js
238 ms
flickity.js
420 ms
tatsuCarousel.min.js
256 ms
fitvids.js
294 ms
transparentheader.js
316 ms
superfish.js
312 ms
hoverintent.js
306 ms
magnificpopup.js
325 ms
easing.js
382 ms
topimg.png
427 ms
dave.jpg
426 ms
yellow-triangle.svg
427 ms
collect
37 ms
seoco.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
seoco.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
seoco.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Seoco.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Seoco.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
seoco.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of SEO Co. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: