Tools & Wizards About Us
seomark.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

seomark.ru

Фотография, радиотехника, веб-дизайн и поисковая оптимизация

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

537 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

173 ms

seomark.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit seomark.ru now to see the best up-to-date Seomark content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about seomark.ru

Фотография, поисковая оптимизация, радиотехника, обработка фотографий, преобразователи напряжения, зарядные устройства, обзоры интересных программ

Visit seomark.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Seomark.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 537 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

seomark.ru performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

97/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

89/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,390 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.852

4/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.7 s

36/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

seomark.ru

537 ms

seocss.css

144 ms

data.js

268 ms

adsbygoogle.js

93 ms

smile.gif

284 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Seomark.ru, 18% (7 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 15% (6 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (537 ms) belongs to the original domain Seomark.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 41.8 kB (9%)

Content Size

462.8 kB

After Optimization

421.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Seomark.ru main page is 462.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 405.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 40.0 kB

  • Original 51.4 kB
  • After minification 47.4 kB
  • After compression 11.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 352 B

  • Original 4.4 kB
  • After minification 4.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Seomark images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 405.0 kB
  • After minification 404.9 kB
  • After compression 403.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 393 B

  • Original 2.0 kB
  • After minification 2.0 kB
  • After compression 1.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Seomark.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 393 B or 20% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (65%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Seomark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

seomark.ru

seomark.ru

537 ms

seocss.css

seocss.css

144 ms

data.js

data.js

268 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

93 ms

smile.gif

smile.gif

284 ms

3_1_FFFFFFFF_EFEFEFFF_0_pageviews

3_1_FFFFFFFF_EFEFEFFF_0_pageviews

415 ms

78ca09e269de22c646ffbd93d517b8bb3557_103.gif

78ca09e269de22c646ffbd93d517b8bb3557_103.gif

384 ms

fonleft.png

fonleft.png

183 ms

fonright.png

fonright.png

268 ms

seosmall.gif

seosmall.gif

276 ms

photosmall.gif

photosmall.gif

269 ms

softsmall.gif

softsmall.gif

271 ms

maroz55.png

maroz55.png

273 ms

fontseo.jpg

fontseo.jpg

158 ms

fontphoto.jpg

fontphoto.jpg

282 ms

fonsoft.jpg

fonsoft.jpg

284 ms

hit

hit

250 ms

watch.js

watch.js

0 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

245 ms

hit

hit

502 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

33 ms

ads

ads

486 ms

load_preloaded_resource.js

load_preloaded_resource.js

28 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

27 ms

s

s

4 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

24 ms

qs_click_protection.js

qs_click_protection.js

31 ms

ufs_web_display.js

ufs_web_display.js

19 ms

bbae3fd3506d8d9338f85d10ea9db8af.js

bbae3fd3506d8d9338f85d10ea9db8af.js

123 ms

icon.png

icon.png

17 ms

css

css

33 ms

sodar

sodar

114 ms

activeview

activeview

89 ms

J23fcjYtRQif16sy8ro7eXEnEArCvdqXEoVeVS6IgPU.js

J23fcjYtRQif16sy8ro7eXEnEArCvdqXEoVeVS6IgPU.js

18 ms

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrwEIJllpyw.ttf

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrwEIJllpyw.ttf

93 ms

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrw2IJllpyw.ttf

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrw2IJllpyw.ttf

103 ms

sodar2.js

sodar2.js

7 ms

runner.html

runner.html

8 ms

aframe

aframe

34 ms

q3_ozqIbHCwHEmDedgzG-D6UnUyzi2L496FFdqoLokA.js

q3_ozqIbHCwHEmDedgzG-D6UnUyzi2L496FFdqoLokA.js

3 ms

Accessibility Review

seomark.ru accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

seomark.ru best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

seomark.ru SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Seomark.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Seomark.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

seomark.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Seomark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: