Tools & Wizards About Us
serp.watch screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

serp.watch

ZipTie.dev SEO tool

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

71 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

serp.watch screenshot

About Website

Welcome to serp.watch homepage info - get ready to check Serp best content for Poland right away, or after learning these important things about serp.watch

Understand SEO...

Visit serp.watch

Key Findings

We analyzed Serp.watch page load time and found that the first response time was 71 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

serp.watch performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

35/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.8 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,630 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.692

7/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.9 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

serp.watch

71 ms

ziptie.dev

344 ms

css2

48 ms

style-blocks.build.css

24 ms

styles.css

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Serp.watch, 86% (67 requests) were made to Ziptie.dev and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (514 ms) relates to the external source Ziptie.dev.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 72.8 kB (3%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Serp.watch main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 41.0 kB

  • Original 50.3 kB
  • After minification 39.9 kB
  • After compression 9.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.4 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 29.9 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Serp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 317.7 kB
  • After minification 317.7 kB
  • After compression 316.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 442 B

  • Original 57.7 kB
  • After minification 57.7 kB
  • After compression 57.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Serp.watch has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (48%)

Requests Now

69

After Optimization

36

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Serp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

serp.watch

serp.watch

71 ms

ziptie.dev

ziptie.dev

344 ms

css2

css2

48 ms

style-blocks.build.css

style-blocks.build.css

24 ms

styles.css

styles.css

25 ms

form-basic.css

form-basic.css

37 ms

style.css

style.css

45 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

35 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

43 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

38 ms

post-756.css

post-756.css

38 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

46 ms

global.css

global.css

68 ms

css

css

67 ms

js

js

92 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

81 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

67 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

84 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

85 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

112 ms

index.js

index.js

87 ms

index.js

index.js

85 ms

dismiss.js

dismiss.js

86 ms

main-script.min.js

main-script.min.js

112 ms

api.js

api.js

81 ms

index.js

index.js

87 ms

hxjnfb187v

hxjnfb187v

157 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

72 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

51 ms

icon-menu-open.svg

icon-menu-open.svg

49 ms

zipper-short-color.svg

zipper-short-color.svg

79 ms

logo-color.svg

logo-color.svg

47 ms

icon-menu-close.svg

icon-menu-close.svg

46 ms

zipper.svg

zipper.svg

51 ms

sticker-wow.svg

sticker-wow.svg

59 ms

icon-check-light.svg

icon-check-light.svg

57 ms

img-about.svg

img-about.svg

54 ms

icon-check.svg

icon-check.svg

57 ms

unnamed-file.png

unnamed-file.png

61 ms

kw_list.png

kw_list.png

86 ms

competition.png

competition.png

87 ms

details.png

details.png

87 ms

gsc1-1.png

gsc1-1.png

84 ms

gsc2.png

gsc2.png

79 ms

indexing.png

indexing.png

145 ms

unnamed-file-384x215.png

unnamed-file-384x215.png

89 ms

kw_list-384x215.png

kw_list-384x215.png

147 ms

competition-384x215.png

competition-384x215.png

168 ms

details-384x215.png

details-384x215.png

148 ms

gsc1-1-384x215.png

gsc1-1-384x215.png

145 ms

gsc2-384x215.png

gsc2-384x215.png

148 ms

indexing-384x215.png

indexing-384x215.png

149 ms

img-features.svg

img-features.svg

149 ms

1.svg

1.svg

152 ms

2.svg

2.svg

151 ms

3.svg

3.svg

149 ms

4.svg

4.svg

149 ms

sticker-hot.svg

sticker-hot.svg

152 ms

img-pricing.svg

img-pricing.svg

149 ms

person1.jpg

person1.jpg

152 ms

icon-linkedin-light.svg

icon-linkedin-light.svg

152 ms

bartosz.jpg

bartosz.jpg

150 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

52 ms

sebastian_old.jpg

sebastian_old.jpg

119 ms

zipper-short.svg

zipper-short.svg

120 ms

icon-twitter-white.svg

icon-twitter-white.svg

122 ms

icon-newsletter-white.svg

icon-newsletter-white.svg

122 ms

icon-newsletter.svg

icon-newsletter.svg

120 ms

clarity.js

clarity.js

141 ms

Inter-SemiBold.woff

Inter-SemiBold.woff

339 ms

Inter-Bold.woff

Inter-Bold.woff

304 ms

Inter-ExtraBold.woff

Inter-ExtraBold.woff

392 ms

Inter-Black.woff

Inter-Black.woff

360 ms

Inter-Medium.woff

Inter-Medium.woff

391 ms

Inter-Regular.woff

Inter-Regular.woff

514 ms

font

font

23 ms

Inter-Light.woff

Inter-Light.woff

495 ms

c.gif

c.gif

7 ms

Accessibility Review

serp.watch accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

serp.watch best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

serp.watch SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Serp.watch can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Serp.watch main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

serp.watch

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Serp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: