15.7 sec in total
229 ms
12.4 sec
3 sec
Click here to check amazing Setup content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about setup.lighting
Innovative lighting solutions made of solid wood and other natural materials. Get more attention through visibility and differentiation and get the real market advantage by attracting satisfied custom...
Visit setup.lightingWe analyzed Setup.lighting page load time and found that the first response time was 229 ms and then it took 15.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
setup.lighting performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value17.6 s
0/100
10%
Value19.0 s
0/100
25%
Value26.2 s
0/100
10%
Value860 ms
33/100
30%
Value0.072
96/100
15%
Value32.7 s
0/100
10%
229 ms
1871 ms
509 ms
297 ms
297 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Setup.lighting, 7% (5 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Player.vimeo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Setup.lighting.
Page size can be reduced by 3.0 MB (10%)
29.7 MB
26.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Setup.lighting main page is 29.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 26.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 127.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 127.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 66.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Setup images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.6 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.6 MB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Setup.lighting needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (60%)
65
26
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Setup. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
setup.lighting
229 ms
www.setup.lighting
1871 ms
sfsi-style.css
509 ms
vrm360.css
297 ms
vrm-style.css
297 ms
147dc55f9c5978bcd600ce06d16dc681.min.css
984 ms
jquery.min.js
434 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
411 ms
three.min.js
1040 ms
OrbitControls.js
492 ms
WebGL.js
518 ms
VRMLLoader.js
533 ms
DDSLoader.js
591 ms
MTLLoader.js
604 ms
OBJLoader.js
620 ms
FBXLoader.js
730 ms
inflate.min.js
689 ms
ColladaLoader.js
799 ms
STLLoader.js
718 ms
THREEx.FullScreen.js
786 ms
inserter.js
822 ms
js
60 ms
style.min.css
748 ms
rs6.css
883 ms
index.js
666 ms
index.js
697 ms
rbtools.min.js
941 ms
rs6.min.js
1562 ms
core.min.js
937 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
938 ms
jquery.shuffle.min.js
939 ms
random-shuffle-min.js
939 ms
custom.js
955 ms
dwf.js
981 ms
b1775b5824777c4dbe5669ad99ffb5fe.min.js
982 ms
js
65 ms
gtm.js
115 ms
390302546
481 ms
835823185
475 ms
logo-Setup-png.png
181 ms
logo-Setup-e1595014061727.png
181 ms
render_wood_ring_dual-scaled-e1667201195493.jpg
700 ms
render_wood_ellipse-scaled.jpg
580 ms
reference_donut_lfs-scaled.jpg
568 ms
render_wood_ring_LFS-scaled.jpg
7056 ms
Chandelier_Dual3-scaled.jpg
785 ms
render_wood_freestanding-scaled.jpg
788 ms
YOURDESIGN_EN-scaled.jpg
703 ms
klinik-waldhaus_8.jpg
1592 ms
klinik-waldhaus_7.jpg
810 ms
klinik-waldhaus_6.jpg
817 ms
klinik-waldhaus_5-e1667207427176.jpg
908 ms
klinik-waldhaus_1.jpg
903 ms
klinik-waldhaus_4-e1667207838539.jpg
952 ms
klinik-waldhaus_3.jpg
960 ms
klinik-waldhaus_2-e1667207874852.jpg
1020 ms
analytics.js
106 ms
js
105 ms
awb-icons.woff
934 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
990 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1003 ms
sdk.js
98 ms
js
252 ms
insight.min.js
250 ms
sdk.js
124 ms
collect
186 ms
854376760-65635cb546c7192ef155ddde42f4688fe80c4c7b1711fd2d4958868dd2d4a51c-d
339 ms
1683454828-883822920e78417b67df70a743b9dadf08652f677616b7bf0f17b975529c51ca-d
323 ms
124 ms
insight_tag_errors.gif
103 ms
setup.lighting accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
setup.lighting best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
setup.lighting SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Setup.lighting can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Setup.lighting main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
setup.lighting
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Setup. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: