Tools & Wizards About Us
sfareporting.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

sfareporting.com

Pharma SFA | FMCG SFA | Pharma MR Reporting - SFA Reporting

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

434 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

579 ms

sfareporting.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to sfareporting.com homepage info - get ready to check SFA Reporting best content right away, or after learning these important things about sfareporting.com

SFA Reporting provides Pharma SFA and FMCG SFA Software and solution to Pharmaceutical and FMCG companies all over the world with dedicated technical and support teams. Check out best services with SF...

Visit sfareporting.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sfareporting.com page load time and found that the first response time was 434 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sfareporting.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,120 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.276

44/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.8 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sfareporting.com

434 ms

font-awesome.min.css

109 ms

buttons.css

197 ms

social-icons.css

198 ms

bootstrap.min.css

306 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Sfareporting.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (952 ms) belongs to the original domain Sfareporting.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 499.1 kB (32%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sfareporting.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 38.8 kB
  • After minification 33.4 kB
  • After compression 6.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.4 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 434.4 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 844.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, SFA Reporting needs image optimization as it can save up to 434.4 kB or 34% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 25.0 kB

  • Original 197.1 kB
  • After minification 197.1 kB
  • After compression 172.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 25.0 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 7.8 kB

  • Original 66.7 kB
  • After minification 66.7 kB
  • After compression 58.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sfareporting.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.8 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (28%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

36

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SFA Reporting. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sfareporting.com

sfareporting.com

434 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

109 ms

buttons.css

buttons.css

197 ms

social-icons.css

social-icons.css

198 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

306 ms

style.css

style.css

371 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

218 ms

home-pages-customizer.css

home-pages-customizer.css

199 ms

animate.css

animate.css

293 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

882 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

268 ms

main.js

main.js

841 ms

jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-packed.js

jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-packed.js

858 ms

wow.js

wow.js

864 ms

js

js

94 ms

sfareporting-logo.png

sfareporting-logo.png

869 ms

pharmaReporting.png

pharmaReporting.png

900 ms

pharmaFmcg.png

pharmaFmcg.png

923 ms

sfaPharma.png

sfaPharma.png

881 ms

DCR-icon.png

DCR-icon.png

859 ms

tour-icon.png

tour-icon.png

860 ms

edetailing-icon.png

edetailing-icon.png

860 ms

location-tracking-icon.png

location-tracking-icon.png

878 ms

crm-icon.png

crm-icon.png

879 ms

rcpa-icon.png

rcpa-icon.png

881 ms

expense-icon.png

expense-icon.png

881 ms

secondary-sale-icon.png

secondary-sale-icon.png

896 ms

gift-sample-icon.png

gift-sample-icon.png

898 ms

target-sale-icon.png

target-sale-icon.png

899 ms

incentive-icon.png

incentive-icon.png

899 ms

doctor-icon.png

doctor-icon.png

890 ms

chemist-icon.png

chemist-icon.png

908 ms

order-booking-icon.png

order-booking-icon.png

910 ms

stock-managmenet-icon.png

stock-managmenet-icon.png

910 ms

delivery-tracking-icon.png

delivery-tracking-icon.png

910 ms

intera-mail-icon.png

intera-mail-icon.png

950 ms

attandance-icon.png

attandance-icon.png

951 ms

salary-icon.png

salary-icon.png

952 ms

mis-report-icon.png

mis-report-icon.png

917 ms

SFAeDetailing.png

SFAeDetailing.png

831 ms

SfaBenefits.png

SfaBenefits.png

839 ms

apex.png

apex.png

824 ms

dabur.png

dabur.png

827 ms

torrentpharma.png

torrentpharma.png

754 ms

britannia.png

britannia.png

764 ms

more-clients.png

more-clients.png

627 ms

astrazeneca.png

astrazeneca.png

256 ms

balpharma.png

balpharma.png

238 ms

mendine.png

mendine.png

231 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

118 ms

js

js

64 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

103 ms

Accessibility Review

sfareporting.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

sfareporting.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

sfareporting.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sfareporting.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Sfareporting.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sfareporting.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SFA Reporting. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: