Tools & Wizards About Us
sfceng.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

sfceng.com

Home - SFC Engineering Inc.

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

759 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

225 ms

sfceng.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to sfceng.com homepage info - get ready to check SFC Eng best content right away, or after learning these important things about sfceng.com

Visit sfceng.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sfceng.com page load time and found that the first response time was 759 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sfceng.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.0 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value950 ms

29/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.07

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.5 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.sfceng.com

759 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

88 ms

layerslider.css

148 ms

wp_head.css

179 ms

settings.css

237 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Sfceng.com, 12% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (759 ms) belongs to the original domain Sfceng.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 462.1 kB (16%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sfceng.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 56.8 kB

  • Original 70.5 kB
  • After minification 65.9 kB
  • After compression 13.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 247.0 kB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, SFC Eng needs image optimization as it can save up to 247.0 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 106.5 kB

  • Original 401.9 kB
  • After minification 401.9 kB
  • After compression 295.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 106.5 kB or 27% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 51.8 kB

  • Original 177.9 kB
  • After minification 177.9 kB
  • After compression 126.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sfceng.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 51.8 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (56%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SFC Eng. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.sfceng.com

www.sfceng.com

759 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

88 ms

layerslider.css

layerslider.css

148 ms

wp_head.css

wp_head.css

179 ms

settings.css

settings.css

237 ms

style.css

style.css

179 ms

style.css

style.css

356 ms

css

css

35 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

238 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

270 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

239 ms

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

303 ms

jquery-easing-1.3.js

jquery-easing-1.3.js

294 ms

jquerytransit.js

jquerytransit.js

302 ms

layerslider.transitions.js

layerslider.transitions.js

302 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

335 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

461 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

459 ms

et-core-unified-3-17082896050967.min.css

et-core-unified-3-17082896050967.min.css

458 ms

mlab_popup.css

mlab_popup.css

459 ms

css

css

27 ms

custom.unified.js

custom.unified.js

531 ms

common.js

common.js

470 ms

wp_footer.js

wp_footer.js

470 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

471 ms

mlab_popup.js

mlab_popup.js

471 ms

logo54.jpg

logo54.jpg

312 ms

fireprotection1.jpg

fireprotection1.jpg

315 ms

Civil-Engineering3.jpg

Civil-Engineering3.jpg

314 ms

rw1.jpg

rw1.jpg

313 ms

ACCESSIBILITY.jpg

ACCESSIBILITY.jpg

316 ms

Fire-Protection-Engineering1.png

Fire-Protection-Engineering1.png

97 ms

Civil-Engineering1.png

Civil-Engineering1.png

311 ms

circle.png

circle.png

362 ms

Code-Review-and-ADA-Compliance1.png

Code-Review-and-ADA-Compliance1.png

312 ms

homeowner.png

homeowner.png

314 ms

associations1a.jpg

associations1a.jpg

314 ms

associations2.jpg

associations2.jpg

315 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

67 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

69 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

71 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWA.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWA.woff

27 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHw.woff

33 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-s.woff

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-s.woff

46 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw.woff

55 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHw.woff

55 ms

modules.ttf

modules.ttf

121 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff

54 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

62 ms

revicons.woff

revicons.woff

63 ms

Accessibility Review

sfceng.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

sfceng.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sfceng.com SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sfceng.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sfceng.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sfceng.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SFC Eng. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: