2.9 sec in total
424 ms
1.7 sec
775 ms
Click here to check amazing Sfur content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sfur.com
URAC accredited Independent Review Organization (IRO) providing Utilization Review/Management (UR/UM), Peer Review, Medical Cost Containment, Expert Medical Witness, Physician Reads, and Compliance, F...
Visit sfur.comWe analyzed Sfur.com page load time and found that the first response time was 424 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
sfur.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
5/100
10%
Value17.0 s
0/100
25%
Value11.8 s
4/100
10%
Value1,970 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.169
70/100
15%
Value18.3 s
3/100
10%
424 ms
152 ms
22 ms
39 ms
38 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Sfur.com, 11% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (424 ms) belongs to the original domain Sfur.com.
Page size can be reduced by 173.7 kB (9%)
2.0 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Sfur.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 673.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 135.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 135.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sfur images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 6.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 24.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sfur.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (84%)
70
11
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sfur. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sfur.com
424 ms
gtm.js
152 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
22 ms
style.min.css
39 ms
styles.css
38 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
131 ms
jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.min.css
41 ms
simple-banner.css
42 ms
trx_addons_icons-embedded.css
43 ms
swiper.min.css
41 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
43 ms
trx_addons.css
80 ms
trx_addons.animation.css
49 ms
style.css
92 ms
js_composer.min.css
147 ms
css
124 ms
fontello-embedded.css
181 ms
style.css
72 ms
style.css
53 ms
__styles.css
60 ms
__colors.css
110 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
96 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
98 ms
responsive.css
99 ms
jquery.min.js
141 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
106 ms
simple-banner.js
106 ms
css
61 ms
v4-shims.min.css
115 ms
all.min.css
115 ms
rs6.css
160 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
115 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
115 ms
index.js
116 ms
core.min.js
116 ms
datepicker.min.js
117 ms
jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.min.js
117 ms
mouse.min.js
117 ms
slider.min.js
119 ms
controlgroup.min.js
119 ms
api.js
99 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
133 ms
button.min.js
126 ms
jquery-ui-sliderAccess.js
128 ms
rbtools.min.js
142 ms
rs6.min.js
216 ms
swiper.jquery.min.js
127 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
126 ms
trx_addons.js
126 ms
index.js
121 ms
superfish.js
117 ms
__scripts.js
115 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
111 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
91 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
75 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
73 ms
tabs.min.js
73 ms
effect.min.js
80 ms
effect-fade.min.js
69 ms
forms.js
70 ms
SFUR_logo_dec-19-600x258-1.jpg
252 ms
dummy.png
55 ms
male-blur-1-84x84.jpg
248 ms
female-blur-1-84x84.jpg
247 ms
male-blur-2-84x84.jpg
248 ms
female-blur-2-84x84.jpg
249 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYiFWUUw.ttf
196 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4iFWUUw.ttf
197 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-WYiFWUUw.ttf
200 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-FWUUw.ttf
200 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-ro-FWUUw.ttf
198 ms
0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787weuxJPkqg.ttf
200 ms
0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787z5vBJPkqg.ttf
199 ms
dQNL70YmBhcADHYj9AAA
11 ms
fontello.svg
186 ms
DewXAiKGIjI2Nf5AbGnRwMHAzJBRsZWJ02MTAyaIEYm7mYGDkgLD4GMIvNaRfTAaA0J5DN7rSLwQHCZmZw2ajC2BEYscGhI2Ijc4rLRjUQbxdHAwMji0NHckgESEkkEGzmYWLk0drB+L91A0vvRiYGFwAMdiP0AAA=
8 ms
trx_addons_icons.svg
184 ms
Urac-2023-Logo-update.png
143 ms
recaptcha__en.js
241 ms
iframe_api
152 ms
0QI8MX1D_JOuMw_hLdO6T2wV9KnW-MoFoqF2mQ.ttf
84 ms
0QI8MX1D_JOuMw_hLdO6T2wV9KnW-C0CoqF2mQ.ttf
84 ms
www-widgetapi.js
65 ms
sfur.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sfur.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
sfur.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sfur.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sfur.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sfur.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sfur. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: