Tools & Wizards About Us
sgw.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

sgw.com

SGW Integrated Marketing | Minority Women Business Enterprise

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

73 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

440 ms

sgw.com screenshot

About Website

Visit sgw.com now to see the best up-to-date SGW content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sgw.com

Since 1990, SGW has provided essential marketing and advertising solutions to global brands and local clients. SGW - Simply Great Work

Visit sgw.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sgw.com page load time and found that the first response time was 73 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sgw.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.3 s

29/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,830 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.046

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.1 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sgw.com

73 ms

www.sgw.com

1790 ms

otSDKStub.js

25 ms

styles.css

45 ms

normalize.css

54 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Sgw.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.cookielaw.org and 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Sgw.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 386.6 kB (23%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sgw.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 52.0 kB

  • Original 62.6 kB
  • After minification 56.2 kB
  • After compression 10.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 298.9 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 814.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, SGW needs image optimization as it can save up to 298.9 kB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 10.9 kB

  • Original 422.1 kB
  • After minification 422.1 kB
  • After compression 411.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 24.7 kB

  • Original 74.1 kB
  • After minification 73.8 kB
  • After compression 49.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sgw.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.7 kB or 33% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (52%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SGW. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sgw.com

sgw.com

73 ms

www.sgw.com

www.sgw.com

1790 ms

otSDKStub.js

otSDKStub.js

25 ms

styles.css

styles.css

45 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

54 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

55 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

54 ms

grid-flex.css

grid-flex.css

49 ms

main.css

main.css

55 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

110 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

113 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

202 ms

post-46.css

post-46.css

179 ms

global.css

global.css

111 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

112 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

128 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

134 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

138 ms

index.js

index.js

137 ms

index.js

index.js

169 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

183 ms

main.js

main.js

179 ms

api.js

api.js

79 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

180 ms

index.js

index.js

303 ms

48934789-a038-4d21-925a-bcdef0eb23a5.json

48934789-a038-4d21-925a-bcdef0eb23a5.json

15 ms

location

location

31 ms

css2

css2

53 ms

otBannerSdk.js

otBannerSdk.js

15 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

92 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

80 ms

logo.png

logo.png

80 ms

sgw-logo-mobile.png

sgw-logo-mobile.png

83 ms

home-poster-bg.jpg

home-poster-bg.jpg

84 ms

aerco-logo.png

aerco-logo.png

6 ms

Nestle-Logo.png

Nestle-Logo.png

82 ms

st-peters-logo.png

st-peters-logo.png

81 ms

UCUCNJ.png

UCUCNJ.png

84 ms

charles-jones-logo.png

charles-jones-logo.png

184 ms

mbi-logo.png

mbi-logo.png

185 ms

umdnj-logo.png

umdnj-logo.png

189 ms

fujifilm-logo.png

fujifilm-logo.png

189 ms

head-philosophy.png

head-philosophy.png

189 ms

head-proccess.png

head-proccess.png

189 ms

head-product.png

head-product.png

189 ms

logo-wo-bg.png

logo-wo-bg.png

286 ms

NMSDC_CERIFIED_2023.png

NMSDC_CERIFIED_2023.png

258 ms

WBE_Seal_RGB.png

WBE_Seal_RGB.png

332 ms

minoritywomen-logo.png

minoritywomen-logo.png

227 ms

WOSB-Certified400x427.png

WOSB-Certified400x427.png

330 ms

OpenSans-Light.woff

OpenSans-Light.woff

105 ms

OpenSans-Regular.woff

OpenSans-Regular.woff

107 ms

font

font

107 ms

OpenSans-Bold.woff

OpenSans-Bold.woff

123 ms

custom-previous-arrow.svg

custom-previous-arrow.svg

51 ms

custom-next-arrow.svg

custom-next-arrow.svg

82 ms

Accessibility Review

sgw.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

sgw.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

sgw.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sgw.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sgw.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sgw.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of SGW. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: