805 ms in total
104 ms
412 ms
289 ms
Welcome to shadowsatthedoor.com homepage info - get ready to check Shadows At The Door best content right away, or after learning these important things about shadowsatthedoor.com
Drawing on the haunted landscape of classic folk horror, the podcast lifts the veil on some of your favourite ghost stories.
Visit shadowsatthedoor.comWe analyzed Shadowsatthedoor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 104 ms and then it took 701 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
shadowsatthedoor.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
45/100
10%
Value18.4 s
0/100
25%
Value8.0 s
22/100
10%
Value290 ms
80/100
30%
Value0.008
100/100
15%
Value11.9 s
16/100
10%
104 ms
41 ms
42 ms
52 ms
73 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Shadowsatthedoor.com, 20% (8 requests) were made to Api.iconify.design and 8% (3 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (119 ms) relates to the external source Use.typekit.net.
Page size can be reduced by 37.9 kB (6%)
639.9 kB
602.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Shadowsatthedoor.com main page is 639.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 480.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.7 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shadows At The Door images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 111 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shadowsatthedoor.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (77%)
35
8
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shadows At The Door. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
shadowsatthedoor.com
104 ms
shadowsatthedoor.com
41 ms
jquery-3.3.1.slim.min.js
42 ms
popper.min.js
52 ms
iconify.min.js
73 ms
kfz3rze.css
119 ms
css2
61 ms
style.min.css
35 ms
cookie-law-info-public.css
53 ms
cookie-law-info-gdpr.css
50 ms
frontend.css
50 ms
style.css
48 ms
flexslider.css
54 ms
jquery.min.js
52 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
55 ms
cookie-law-info-public.js
63 ms
email-decode.min.js
53 ms
jquery.min.js
47 ms
frontend.js
83 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
80 ms
customjs.js
69 ms
p.css
22 ms
SATD-logo.png
45 ms
webcomponents-lite.min.js
34 ms
image.gif
39 ms
shadows-logo-wide.png
27 ms
image_6487327-2.jpg
26 ms
merch-box.jpg
29 ms
book-1.jpg
34 ms
gg.js
43 ms
jam.js
59 ms
fa-solid.js
60 ms
bx.js
61 ms
simple-icons.js
66 ms
mdi.js
58 ms
ant-design.js
68 ms
clarity.js
66 ms
kmKnZrc3Hgbbcjq75U4uslyuy4kn0pNe.ttf
34 ms
d
24 ms
d
26 ms
shadowsatthedoor.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
shadowsatthedoor.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
shadowsatthedoor.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shadowsatthedoor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shadowsatthedoor.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
shadowsatthedoor.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Shadows At The Door. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: