Tools & Wizards About Us
shafermn.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

shafermn.com

Shafer, MN

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

196 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

260 ms

shafermn.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to shafermn.com homepage info - get ready to check Shafer MN best content right away, or after learning these important things about shafermn.com

Visit shafermn.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Shafermn.com page load time and found that the first response time was 196 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

shafermn.com performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value21.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

71/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value940 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.154

75/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

39/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

shafermn.com

196 ms

shafermn.com

272 ms

revize.css

64 ms

bootstrap.min.css

152 ms

font-awesome.css

197 ms

Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Shafermn.com, 26% (20 requests) were made to Cdn.live6.revize.com and 12% (9 requests) were made to Webgen1files1.revize.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (556 ms) belongs to the original domain Shafermn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 151.8 kB (4%)

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

3.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Shafermn.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 43.0 kB

  • Original 53.6 kB
  • After minification 49.9 kB
  • After compression 10.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 62.8 kB

  • Original 3.2 MB
  • After minification 3.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shafer MN images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 28.0 kB

  • Original 317.6 kB
  • After minification 317.6 kB
  • After compression 289.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 17.9 kB

  • Original 64.0 kB
  • After minification 63.9 kB
  • After compression 46.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shafermn.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.9 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (77%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shafer MN. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

shafermn.com

shafermn.com

196 ms

shafermn.com

shafermn.com

272 ms

revize.css

revize.css

64 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

152 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

197 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

198 ms

main.css

main.css

196 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

196 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

203 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

215 ms

mini.css

mini.css

261 ms

nav-panels.css

nav-panels.css

261 ms

layout.css

layout.css

267 ms

styles.css

styles.css

263 ms

snippet_helper.js

snippet_helper.js

270 ms

element.js

element.js

42 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

294 ms

modernizr.custom.js

modernizr.custom.js

330 ms

jquery.mb.YTPlayer.min.js

jquery.mb.YTPlayer.min.js

346 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

345 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

345 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

347 ms

cookies.js

cookies.js

358 ms

moment.min.js

moment.min.js

397 ms

moment-timezone.min.js

moment-timezone.min.js

397 ms

rrule.js

rrule.js

400 ms

ical.min.js

ical.min.js

406 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

415 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

422 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

461 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

460 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

467 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

471 ms

doT.min.js

doT.min.js

483 ms

ics.deps.min.js

ics.deps.min.js

485 ms

mini.js

mini.js

556 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

556 ms

revize.css

revize.css

271 ms

main.css

main.css

206 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

264 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

258 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

248 ms

nav-panels.css

nav-panels.css

206 ms

snippet_helper.js

snippet_helper.js

211 ms

moment.min.js

moment.min.js

158 ms

moment-timezone.min.js

moment-timezone.min.js

157 ms

rrule.js

rrule.js

155 ms

ical.min.js

ical.min.js

151 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

143 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

137 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

134 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

135 ms

css

css

35 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

130 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

125 ms

doT.min.js

doT.min.js

141 ms

ics.deps.min.js

ics.deps.min.js

139 ms

cross.png

cross.png

91 ms

City%20of%20Shafer%20logo%20(1)%20(1).png

City%20of%20Shafer%20logo%20(1)%20(1).png

92 ms

webhome_XBP_Button_2.1e%20(1)%20(1).png

webhome_XBP_Button_2.1e%20(1)%20(1).png

91 ms

City%20hall%20hours%20.jpg

City%20hall%20hours%20.jpg

93 ms

City%20of%20Shafer%20logo%20(1)%20-%20Copy.jpg

City%20of%20Shafer%20logo%20(1)%20-%20Copy.jpg

94 ms

mini.js

mini.js

166 ms

cross.png

cross.png

126 ms

webhome_XBP_Button_2.1e%20(1)%20(1).png

webhome_XBP_Button_2.1e%20(1)%20(1).png

184 ms

City%20of%20Shafer%20logo%20(1)%20(1).png

City%20of%20Shafer%20logo%20(1)%20(1).png

207 ms

City%20hall%20hours%20.jpg

City%20hall%20hours%20.jpg

216 ms

City%20of%20Shafer%20logo%20(1)%20-%20Copy.jpg

City%20of%20Shafer%20logo%20(1)%20-%20Copy.jpg

182 ms

font

font

179 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

204 ms

font

font

181 ms

DSCN0309%20-%20Copy.JPG

DSCN0309%20-%20Copy.JPG

82 ms

DSCN1393%20-%20Copy.JPG

DSCN1393%20-%20Copy.JPG

91 ms

DSCN0244.JPG

DSCN0244.JPG

98 ms

DSCN0251.JPG

DSCN0251.JPG

121 ms

iframe_api

iframe_api

107 ms

element.js

element.js

66 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

5 ms

Accessibility Review

shafermn.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-*] attributes are not valid or misspelled

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

shafermn.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

shafermn.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shafermn.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shafermn.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

shafermn.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Shafer MN. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: