4.4 sec in total
979 ms
3.2 sec
272 ms
Welcome to shalatel.com homepage info - get ready to check Shalatel best content right away, or after learning these important things about shalatel.com
Sharpen your business skills and develop yourself or your team for increased productivity and effectiveness. Access our free trainings, tools and downloads and stay ahead of competition. Don't be left...
Visit shalatel.comWe analyzed Shalatel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 979 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
shalatel.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.6 s
0/100
10%
Value24.8 s
0/100
25%
Value14.8 s
1/100
10%
Value260 ms
83/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value21.5 s
1/100
10%
979 ms
286 ms
573 ms
33 ms
384 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Shalatel.com, 26% (19 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Shalatel.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (56%)
3.5 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Shalatel.com main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 294 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shalatel images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 976.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 976.0 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 886.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shalatel.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 886.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (85%)
52
8
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shalatel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
shalatel.com
979 ms
styles.css
286 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
573 ms
css
33 ms
swiper.min.css
384 ms
post-7.css
289 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
287 ms
jet-blog.css
575 ms
global.css
381 ms
post-152.css
383 ms
frontend.min.css
1427 ms
elementor-frontend.css
477 ms
style.css
477 ms
darkmode.css
578 ms
scheme.css
580 ms
css
33 ms
plugin.css
579 ms
plugin.css
666 ms
jquery.min.js
760 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
667 ms
post-248.css
488 ms
css
14 ms
rs6.css
583 ms
index.js
583 ms
index.js
585 ms
rbtools.min.js
870 ms
rs6.min.js
870 ms
comment-reply.min.js
678 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
679 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
679 ms
frontend.min.js
876 ms
plugin.js
776 ms
plugin.js
777 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
874 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
872 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1060 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
966 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
969 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1159 ms
hooks.min.js
971 ms
i18n.min.js
965 ms
frontend.min.js
966 ms
waypoints.min.js
967 ms
core.min.js
965 ms
frontend.min.js
962 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
967 ms
jet-blog.min.js
874 ms
Shalatel-CLear-PNG.webp
139 ms
herobg2.jpg
383 ms
slider-people.png
236 ms
preloader.gif
140 ms
cc51c3515783e271b488fac86c560e0a.webp
140 ms
28f5b9_094d0f4bdcc949bf8db3c58ec660ed14mv2.webp
138 ms
4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKfw7w.woff
93 ms
xMQbuFFdSaiXzQUpCA.woff
176 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
187 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff
186 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff
189 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-s.woff
189 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff
189 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw.woff
189 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K67QBi8JoA.woff
187 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K8nQBi8JoA.woff
188 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K-DQBi8JoA.woff
190 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K5fQBi8JoA.woff
226 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K3vXBi8JoA.woff
227 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K0nXBi8JoA.woff
228 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32KxfXBi8JoA.woff
228 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K8nXBi8JoA.woff
228 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K0nWBi8JoA.woff
229 ms
jegicon.woff
134 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjsGyL.woff
139 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3jsGyL.woff
140 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzjsGyL.woff
141 ms
shalatel.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
shalatel.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
shalatel.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shalatel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shalatel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
shalatel.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Shalatel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: