Tools & Wizards About Us
shalimarking.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 91

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    23% of websites

shalimarking.com

Shalimar Game Result - Shalimar Savera/Night, Ghaziabad, Gali, Disawar Game Result

Page Load Speed

774 ms in total

First Response

144 ms

Resources Loaded

519 ms

Page Rendered

111 ms

shalimarking.com screenshot

About Website

Visit shalimarking.com now to see the best up-to-date Shalimar King content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about shalimarking.com

View all Shalimar Game result here - Disawar game result(05:00 AM) - Shalimar savera result(02:30 PM) - Shalimar game result(06:00 PM) - Ghaziabad game result(08:15 PM) - Shalimar night result(09:00 P...

Visit shalimarking.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Shalimarking.com page load time and found that the first response time was 144 ms and then it took 630 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

shalimarking.com performance score

91

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

78/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

87/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.154

75/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

shalimarking.com

144 ms

bootstrap.min.css

28 ms

jquery.min.js

40 ms

bootstrap.min.js

28 ms

font-awesome.css

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Shalimarking.com, 21% (3 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 7% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (216 ms) relates to the external source Fontawesome.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 199.0 kB (59%)

Content Size

335.3 kB

After Optimization

136.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Shalimarking.com main page is 335.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 134.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

  • Original 4.9 kB
  • After minification 4.6 kB
  • After compression 1.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.3 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 72.9 kB
  • After minification 70.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shalimar King images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 90.4 kB

  • Original 134.2 kB
  • After minification 134.2 kB
  • After compression 43.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 90.4 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 103.0 kB

  • Original 123.4 kB
  • After minification 123.0 kB
  • After compression 20.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shalimarking.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 103.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shalimar King. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

shalimarking.com

shalimarking.com

144 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

28 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

40 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

28 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

38 ms

style.css

style.css

98 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

216 ms

mobile.png

mobile.png

57 ms

email.png

email.png

113 ms

1744460241-Sh.jpeg

1744460241-Sh.jpeg

181 ms

package.png

package.png

114 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

3 ms

hd.jpg

hd.jpg

111 ms

sheading.jpg

sheading.jpg

62 ms

Accessibility Review

shalimarking.com accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

shalimarking.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

shalimarking.com SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shalimarking.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Shalimarking.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

shalimarking.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Shalimar King. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: